Guido Andreozzi vs Emilio Gomez — Temuco CH Semi-final

Temuco CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ARG
Guido Andreozzi
#1536ATP
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 November 2022
hard
ECU2
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Andreozzi G.
3-6 7-5 6-1
Gomez E.
Andreozzi G.
3762
Gomez E.
6511

Guido Andreozzi defeated Emilio Gomez 3-6 7-5 6-1 in the Temuco CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Andreozzi G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Andreozzi G.

Serve advantage — Andreozzi G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Andreozzi G.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Andreozzi G.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Even
31
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
66
77
Break points won·Even
21
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
34
23
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Andreozzi G.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Gomez E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.3
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Andreozzi G.
Kicker N.[8]
4-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Andreozzi G.
Gomez E.[2]
3-67-56-1
Kicker N.[8]
Mejia N.
6-26-716-3
Quarter-finals
Andreozzi G.
Otegui J.
6-16-1
Gomez E.[2]
Olivo R.[7]
6-33-66-2
Kicker N.[8]
Bagnis F.[1]
6-06-2
Mejia N.
Hardt N.
6-716-46-4
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Farjat T.
6-17-5
Mejia N.
Lock B.
6-46-3
Hardt N.
Ayeni O.
6-33-67-5
Bagnis F.[1]
Torres J.
6-36-2
Otegui J.
Decamps G.
7-676-4
Kicker N.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
3-66-46-3
Andreozzi G.
Tirante T.
7-646-776-4
Olivo R.[7]
Domingues J.
6-27-61
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Galarza J.
6-45-76-3
Bagnis F.[1]
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-26-0
Ayeni O.
Navone M.
7-666-4
Gomez E.[2]
Paz J.
6-46-3
Farjat T.
Villanueva G.
6-36-4
Domingues J.
Bicknell B.
6-46-2
Olivo R.[7]
Zeballos F.
7-51-66-2
Otegui J.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-56-2
Decamps G.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.
Mena F.[6]
2-67-606-2
Lock B.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
7-636-2
Mejia N.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-1
Hardt N.
Bruna N.
6-16-3
Kicker N.[8]
Alvarez N.
6-27-5
Tirante T.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-35-3
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-02-1