Emilio Gomez vs Tomas Farjat — Temuco CH Round of 16

Temuco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ECU2
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 November 2022
hard
ARG
Tomas Farjat
#754ATP
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLL
Gomez E.
6-1 7-5
Farjat T.
Gomez E.
672
Farjat T.
150

Emilio Gomez defeated Tomas Farjat 6-1 7-5 in the Temuco CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Gomez came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Farjat T.

Farjat T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Farjat T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
44%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Farjat T.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Andreozzi G.
Kicker N.[8]
4-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Andreozzi G.
Gomez E.[2]
3-67-56-1
Kicker N.[8]
Mejia N.
6-26-716-3
Quarter-finals
Andreozzi G.
Otegui J.
6-16-1
Gomez E.[2]
Olivo R.[7]
6-33-66-2
Kicker N.[8]
Bagnis F.[1]
6-06-2
Mejia N.
Hardt N.
6-716-46-4
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Farjat T.
6-17-5
Mejia N.
Lock B.
6-46-3
Hardt N.
Ayeni O.
6-33-67-5
Bagnis F.[1]
Torres J.
6-36-2
Otegui J.
Decamps G.
7-676-4
Kicker N.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
3-66-46-3
Andreozzi G.
Tirante T.
7-646-776-4
Olivo R.[7]
Domingues J.
6-27-61
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Galarza J.
6-45-76-3
Bagnis F.[1]
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-26-0
Ayeni O.
Navone M.
7-666-4
Gomez E.[2]
Paz J.
6-46-3
Farjat T.
Villanueva G.
6-36-4
Domingues J.
Bicknell B.
6-46-2
Olivo R.[7]
Zeballos F.
7-51-66-2
Otegui J.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-56-2
Decamps G.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.
Mena F.[6]
2-67-606-2
Lock B.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
7-636-2
Mejia N.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-1
Hardt N.
Bruna N.
6-16-3
Kicker N.[8]
Alvarez N.
6-27-5
Tirante T.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-35-3
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-02-1