Denis Kudla vs Ulises Blanch — Charlottesville CH Round of 16

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA1
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
Kudla D.
7-6 1-6 6-2
Blanch U.
Kudla D.
77162
Blanch U.
63621

Denis Kudla defeated Ulises Blanch 7-6 1-6 6-2 in the Charlottesville CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Kudla closed it out in three sets, 7–6 1–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-03-21Miami MastersQ2hardDenis Kudla7-6(8) 2-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Blanch U.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Blanch U.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.5
6.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 113). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Blanch U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
19
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
83
Break points won·Clear edge
19
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
19
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
30
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Blanch U.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.6
Surface form
3.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.1
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[6]
Eubanks C.[4]
7-647-5
Semi-finals
Eubanks C.[4]
Nava E.[8]
7-54-66-3
Shelton B.[6]
Jubb P.
7-663-67-5
Quarter-finals
Shelton B.[6]
Gerch L.
6-37-5
Nava E.[8]
Kudla D.[1]
6-26-1
Jubb P.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[4]
Shang J.
4-66-17-68
R16
Jubb P.
Mmoh M.[2]
7-646-3
Gerch L.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-47-63
Shelton B.[6]
Holt B.
6-36-4
Kudla D.[1]
Blanch U.
7-631-66-2
Eubanks C.[4]
Dougaz A.
7-57-68
Montes De La Torre I.
Kovacevic A.[7]
7-646-4
Shang J.
Leshem E.
1-66-36-2
Nava E.[8]
Mena F.
6-26-1
R32
Shelton B.[6]
Rodesch C.
6-46-3
Kudla D.[1]
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Montes De La Torre I.
Ayeni O.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Sandgren T.
6-13-66-2
Leshem E.
Galarneau A.
7-56-3
Mena F.
Cassone M.
3-66-37-68
Jubb P.
Mchugh A.
6-746-36-3
Kozlov S.[3]
Krueger M.
7-50-67-61
Shang J.
Ficovich J.[5]
6-43-66-3
Dougaz A.
Svajda Z.
3-66-26-1
Mmoh M.[2]
Escobedo E.
7-657-5
Gerch L.
Quinn E.
6-36-3
Eubanks C.[4]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-17-63
Nava E.[8]
Ponwith N.
5-76-26-3
Blanch U.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Kovacevic A.[7]
Couacaud E.
6-37-69