Denis Kudla vs Ulises Blanch — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 2

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
USA8
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
Kudla D.
7-6 2-6 6-3
Blanch U.
Kudla D.
710262
Blanch U.
68631

Denis Kudla defeated Ulises Blanch 7-6 2-6 6-3 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Kudla closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Blanch U.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Blanch U.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.5
6.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (168 vs 114). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Blanch U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
19
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
83
Break points won·Clear edge
19
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
19
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
30
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Blanch U.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
4.7
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.0
Minutes 14d
5.9
0.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.6
Country comfort
4.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 57%
Q2
Sock J.
Johnson S.[12]
6-26-2
Daniel T.[10]
Fratangelo B.[24]
6-17-64
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Seppi A.[16]
6-36-4
Galan D.[9]
Kicker N.
5-76-36-4
Wolf J.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[8]
Blanch U.
7-682-66-3
Verdasco F.
Grenier H.
6-37-68
Gomez E.[23]
Gojowczyk P.[5]
3-67-646-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Eubanks C.
2-67-616-1
Kukushkin M.
Mochizuki S.
7-666-2
Krueger M.
Anderson K.[3]
7-657-5
Munar J.[7]
Ymer E.[21]
7-56-3
Q1
Johnson S.[12]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[23]
Tirante T.
7-644-66-3
Grenier H.
Pospisil V.[20]
6-47-65
Verdasco F.
Sousa J.[1]
6-44-66-4
Mochizuki S.
Rune H.[2]
6-10-0
Blanch U.
Moraing M.[19]
6-43-1
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Stebe C.
6-26-2
Ymer E.[21]
Sandgren T.
6-776-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Fabbiano T.
6-16-3
Wolf J.
Querrey S.[11]
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Albot R.[14]
4-67-676-2
Daniel T.[10]
Purcell M.
6-26-2
Galan D.[9]
Damm M.
6-36-4
Anderson K.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Vukic A.[18]
6-42-66-4
Seppi A.[16]
Machac T.
2-66-36-2
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.[15]
6-26-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-2
Munar J.[7]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.[24]
Clarke J.
6-26-1
Kudla D.[8]
Heide G.
6-756-46-3
Kicker N.
Ebden M.
6-26-1
Eubanks C.
Broady L.[17]
6-46-2
Popko D.
Monteiro T.[13]
6-44-66-4