Andrey Rublev vs Dominic Thiem — Gijon Semi-final

Gijon · ATP · Semi-final
Andrey Rublev
RUS1
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
AUT
Dominic Thiem
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Rublev A.
6-4 6-4
Thiem D.
Rublev A.
662
Thiem D.
440

Andrey Rublev defeated Dominic Thiem 6-4 6-4 in the Gijon semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Andrey Rublev came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Andrey Rublev extended the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrey Rublev edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

4–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-01-16Australian OpenR128hardAndrey Rublev6-3 6-4 6-2
2020-11-16Tour FinalsRRhardAndrey Rublev6-2 7-5
2020-10-26ViennaQFhardAndrey Rublev7-6(5) 6-2
2019-07-22HamburgQFclayAndrey Rublev7-6(3) 7-6(5)
2018-04-16Monte Carlo MastersR32clayDominic Thiem5-7 7-5 7-5
2017-10-23ViennaR32hardDominic Thiem6-4 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Thiem D.

Thiem D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rublev A.Thiem D.
55
Serve
—
49
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Thiem D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.9
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Thiem D.
Clutch Rating·Even
88
85
Break points saved·Even
100
98
Break points won·Clear edge
72
58
Deciding sets·Even
97
99
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
92
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rublev A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Thiem D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
6.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Thiem D.
Freshness·
100
—

Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Rublev A.[1]
Korda S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Rublev A.[1]
Thiem D.
6-46-4
Korda S.
Rinderknech A.
7-626-3
Quarter-finals
Rublev A.[1]
Paul T.[5]
7-56-3
Thiem D.
Cerundolo F.[4]
6-46-3
Rinderknech A.
Carreno Busta P.[2]
4-66-37-616
Korda S.
Murray A.
6-41-66-1
R16
Rinderknech A.
Lestienne C.
6-46-2
Murray A.
Cachin P.
2-67-57-63
Cerundolo F.[4]
Guinard M.
7-656-2
Thiem D.
Giron M.
3-66-46-0
Korda S.
Bautista Agut R.[3]
5-76-46-4
Carreno Busta P.[2]
Monteiro T.
6-47-63
Paul T.[5]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-37-63
Rublev A.[1]
Ivashka I.
6-35-76-4
R32
Alvarez Varona N.
Trungelliti M.
1-66-36-0
Giron M.
Ramos A.[8]
4-66-46-2
Murray A.
Davidovich Fokina A.[6]
7-56-2
Cachin P.
Vatutin A.
7-626-0
Guinard M.
Fognini F.
4-66-02-0
Lestienne C.
Baez S.[7]
7-654-4
Paul T.[5]
Landaluce M.
6-36-0
Paul T.
Landaluce M.
6-36-0
Monteiro T.
Bonzi B.
6-47-5
Korda S.
Munar J.
6-46-1
Rinderknech A.
Taberner C.
6-36-3
Thiem D.
Sousa J.
6-26-0
Ivashka I.
Lopez F.
6-36-756-4