Anett Kontaveit vs Tereza Martincova — Tallinn Round of 16

Tallinn · WTA · Round of 16
EST1
Anett Kontaveit
30 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
hard
Tereza Martincova
CZE
Tereza Martincova
#283WTA
1589ELO
1573Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWW
Kontaveit A.
6-2 6-1
Martincova T.
Kontaveit A.
662
Martincova T.
210

Anett Kontaveit defeated Tereza Martincova 6-2 6-1 in the Tallinn round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Anett Kontaveit came in leading the head-to-head 2–1. Anett Kontaveit extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-10-03OstravaR16hardTereza Martincova7-6(3) 1-0 RET
2022-08-15CincinnatiR32hardAnett Kontaveit3-6 7-5 6-4
2017-07-17GstaadSFclayAnett Kontaveit6-4 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Kontaveit A.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Martincova T.

Martincova T.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kontaveit A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kontaveit A.Martincova T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
73%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
42%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
1.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (56 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kontaveit A.Martincova T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
32
Break points saved·Dominant
85
36
Break points won·Clear edge
91
67
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kontaveit A.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Martincova T.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
4.5
Surface form
4.4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Krejcikova B.[7]
Kontaveit A.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Kontaveit A.[1]
Kanepi K.
6-46-4
Krejcikova B.[7]
Bencic B.[2]
6-757-626-2
Quarter-finals
Kontaveit A.[1]
Bonaventure Y.
6-33-66-3
Bencic B.[2]
Vekic D.
6-46-1
Kanepi K.
Muchova K.
6-23-67-66
Krejcikova B.[7]
Haddad Maia B.[3]
6-36-4
R16
Kanepi K.
Li A.
7-57-5
Krejcikova B.[7]
Kostyuk M.
7-56-3
Haddad Maia B.[3]
Noskova L.
6-17-5
Bonaventure Y.
Teichmann J.[9]
7-686-3
Kontaveit A.[1]
Martincova T.
6-26-1
Bencic B.[2]
Boulter K.
6-46-726-3
Vekic D.
Zhang S.[8]
6-26-4
Muchova K.
Golubic V.
4-66-06-2
R32
Zhang S.[8]
Hruncakova V.
7-647-68
Li A.
Liu C.
6-27-5
Kanepi K.
Ostapenko J.[5]
4-66-46-0
Teichmann J.[9]
Siegemund L.
6-47-67
Vekic D.
Nuudi M.
6-26-0
Kostyuk M.
Pera B.
6-44-66-3
Krejcikova B.[7]
Tomljanovic A.
6-17-63
Golubic V.
Keys M.[4]
6-36-2
Kontaveit A.[1]
Wang X.
3-66-27-5
Noskova L.
Parry D.
2-66-36-4
Haddad Maia B.[3]
Wang X.
6-31-66-4
Muchova K.
Ponchet J.
6-06-2
Boulter K.
Cristian J.
6-36-1
Martincova T.
Bjorklund M.
7-666-3
Bencic B.[2]
Malygina E.
6-06-2
Bonaventure Y.
Rogers S.
6-46-4