Ann Li vs Claire Liu — Tallinn Round of 32

Tallinn · WTA · Round of 32
Ann Li
USA
Ann Li
#31WTA
1807ELO
1746Hard ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
hard
Claire Liu
USA
Claire Liu
#111WTA
1669ELO
1635Hard ELO
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWWWWL
Li A.
6-2 7-5
Liu C.
Li A.
672
Liu C.
250

Ann Li defeated Claire Liu 6-2 7-5 in the Tallinn round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #31.

Key context

  • Match story: Ann Li closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Li A.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Liu C.

Liu C.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Li A.

Serve advantage — Li A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Li A.Liu C.
47
Serve
—
49
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Li A.Liu C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
58%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.5
2.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li A.Liu C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
61
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
64
Break points won·Slight edge
87
78
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
79
Tiebreaks·Even
67
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Li A.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 91 days (−1.5)
Liu C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+111 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Hard Elo 1635
7.5Overall Elo 1807
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1669
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.9
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Li A.Liu C.
Freshness·Dominant
100
71

Li A.: 15 days rest · Liu C.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 54 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Krejcikova B.[7]
Kontaveit A.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Kontaveit A.[1]
Kanepi K.
6-46-4
Krejcikova B.[7]
Bencic B.[2]
6-757-626-2
Quarter-finals
Kontaveit A.[1]
Bonaventure Y.
6-33-66-3
Bencic B.[2]
Vekic D.
6-46-1
Kanepi K.
Muchova K.
6-23-67-66
Krejcikova B.[7]
Haddad Maia B.[3]
6-36-4
R16
Kanepi K.
Li A.
7-57-5
Krejcikova B.[7]
Kostyuk M.
7-56-3
Haddad Maia B.[3]
Noskova L.
6-17-5
Bonaventure Y.
Teichmann J.[9]
7-686-3
Kontaveit A.[1]
Martincova T.
6-26-1
Bencic B.[2]
Boulter K.
6-46-726-3
Vekic D.
Zhang S.[8]
6-26-4
Muchova K.
Golubic V.
4-66-06-2
R32
Zhang S.[8]
Hruncakova V.
7-647-68
Li A.
Liu C.
6-27-5
Kanepi K.
Ostapenko J.[5]
4-66-46-0
Teichmann J.[9]
Siegemund L.
6-47-67
Vekic D.
Nuudi M.
6-26-0
Kostyuk M.
Pera B.
6-44-66-3
Krejcikova B.[7]
Tomljanovic A.
6-17-63
Golubic V.
Keys M.[4]
6-36-2
Kontaveit A.[1]
Wang X.
3-66-27-5
Noskova L.
Parry D.
2-66-36-4
Haddad Maia B.[3]
Wang X.
6-31-66-4
Muchova K.
Ponchet J.
6-06-2
Boulter K.
Cristian J.
6-36-1
Martincova T.
Bjorklund M.
7-666-3
Bencic B.[2]
Malygina E.
6-06-2
Bonaventure Y.
Rogers S.
6-46-4