Casper Ruud vs Nicolas Jarry — Seoul Round of 16

Seoul · ATP · Round of 16
Casper Ruud
NOR1
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
hard
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1574Hard ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Ruud C.
6-2 3-6 6-3
Jarry N.
Ruud C.
6362
Jarry N.
2631

Casper Ruud defeated Nicolas Jarry 6-2 3-6 6-3 in the Seoul round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13. Casper Ruud narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Casper Ruud closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-03-18Miami MastersR16hardNicolas Jarry7-6(3) 6-3
2023-05-29Roland GarrosR16clayCasper Ruud7-6(3) 7-5 7-5
2023-05-22GenevaQFclayNicolas Jarry3-6 7-6(2) 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Jarry N.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruud C.Jarry N.
59
Serve
—
31
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Jarry N.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
68%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
66%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
9.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Jarry N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
48
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Dominant
75
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
57
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruud C.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Jarry N.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.7+315 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Hard Elo 1574
8.6Overall Elo 1983
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1648
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
3.8
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Jarry N.
Freshness·
98
—

Ruud C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nishioka Y.
Shapovalov D.[4]
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Shapovalov D.[4]
Brooksby J.[8]
7-56-4
Nishioka Y.
Kovacevic A.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Kovacevic A.
Mcdonald M.
4-66-36-2
Shapovalov D.[4]
Albot R.
6-26-2
Brooksby J.[8]
Norrie C.[2]
W/O
Nishioka Y.
Ruud C.[1]
6-23-66-2
R16
Nishioka Y.
Daniel T.
6-26-4
Albot R.
Johnson S.
7-637-63
Ruud C.[1]
Jarry N.
6-23-66-3
Shapovalov D.[4]
Munar J.
7-56-4
Brooksby J.[8]
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Norrie C.[2]
Uchida K.
6-26-2
Mcdonald M.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-4
Kovacevic A.
Tseng C.
7-656-746-2
R32
Tseng C.
Oconnell C.
6-40-0
Daniel T.
Gomez E.
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.
Evans D.[5]
6-27-63
Kovacevic A.
Kecmanovic M.[7]
6-46-4
Johnson S.
Nam J.
7-636-4
Brooksby J.[8]
Wu T.
7-653-66-0
Kwon S.
Chung Y.
7-656-736-1
Munar J.
Watanuki Y.
2-1
Uchida K.
Hong S.
6-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Martinez P.
7-56-4
Jarry N.
Peniston R.
6-37-68
Albot R.
Moriya H.
6-36-4