Nicolas Jarry vs Ryan Peniston — Seoul Round of 32

Seoul · ATP · Round of 32
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1574Hard ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
hard
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Jarry N.
6-3 7-6
Peniston R.
Jarry N.
67102
Peniston R.
3680

Nicolas Jarry defeated Ryan Peniston 6-3 7-6 in the Seoul round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Nicolas Jarry closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jarry N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jarry N.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.0
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jarry N.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
20
Break points saved·Dominant
98
60
Break points won·Clear edge
4
25
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jarry N.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Peniston R.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+172 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1402
7.6Overall Elo 1648
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1441
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nishioka Y.
Shapovalov D.[4]
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Shapovalov D.[4]
Brooksby J.[8]
7-56-4
Nishioka Y.
Kovacevic A.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Kovacevic A.
Mcdonald M.
4-66-36-2
Shapovalov D.[4]
Albot R.
6-26-2
Brooksby J.[8]
Norrie C.[2]
W/O
Nishioka Y.
Ruud C.[1]
6-23-66-2
R16
Nishioka Y.
Daniel T.
6-26-4
Albot R.
Johnson S.
7-637-63
Ruud C.[1]
Jarry N.
6-23-66-3
Shapovalov D.[4]
Munar J.
7-56-4
Brooksby J.[8]
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Norrie C.[2]
Uchida K.
6-26-2
Mcdonald M.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-4
Kovacevic A.
Tseng C.
7-656-746-2
R32
Tseng C.
Oconnell C.
6-40-0
Daniel T.
Gomez E.
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.
Evans D.[5]
6-27-63
Kovacevic A.
Kecmanovic M.[7]
6-46-4
Johnson S.
Nam J.
7-636-4
Brooksby J.[8]
Wu T.
7-653-66-0
Kwon S.
Chung Y.
7-656-736-1
Munar J.
Watanuki Y.
2-1
Uchida K.
Hong S.
6-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Martinez P.
7-56-4
Jarry N.
Peniston R.
6-37-68
Albot R.
Moriya H.
6-36-4