Luca Nardi vs Zizou Bergs — Manacor CH Final

Manacor CH · CHALLENGER · Final
ITA7
Luca Nardi
#160ATP
1585ELO
1572Hard ELO
$213kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
hard
Zizou Bergs
BEL4
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
Nardi L.
7-6 3-6 7-5
Bergs Z.
Nardi L.
77372
Bergs Z.
62651

Luca Nardi defeated Zizou Bergs 7-6 3-6 7-5 in the Manacor CH final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35. Luca Nardi extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Luca Nardi closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-02-24DubaiR16hardLuca Nardi6-4 7-6(3)
2025-01-06AucklandR16hardZizou Bergs6-1 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Nardi L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Nardi L.

Serve advantage — Bergs Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nardi L.Bergs Z.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nardi L.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
6.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nardi L.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
69
Break points saved·Even
92
95
Break points won·Slight edge
15
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
42
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
17
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nardi L.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Bergs Z.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.0Hard Elo 1572
Surface ELO
7.0+185 Hard Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1585
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1808
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.3
Surface form
7.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.4
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nardi L.Bergs Z.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
82

Nardi L.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d) · Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.[7]
Bergs Z.[4]
7-623-67-5
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[4]
Shelbayh A.
6-46-4
Nardi L.[7]
Lazarov A.
6-716-36-1
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.[7]
Janowicz J.
6-23-66-1
Lazarov A.
Kukushkin M.
6-746-47-63
Shelbayh A.
Popko D.
5-76-36-1
Bergs Z.[4]
Clarke J.
6-36-2
R16
Janowicz J.
Peniston R.[2]
6-26-4
Nardi L.[7]
Celikbilek A.
6-47-5
Lazarov A.
Vukic A.[3]
6-34-66-4
Kukushkin M.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-4
Bergs Z.[4]
Furness E.
6-37-68
Popko D.
Riedi L.
6-736-46-1
Clarke J.
Bellier A.
6-46-4
Shelbayh A.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-14-1
R32
Clarke J.
Barrere G.[5]
1-67-661-1
Janowicz J.
Ofner S.
6-36-4
Nardi L.[7]
De Jong J.
3-66-16-2
Kukushkin M.
Maestrelli F.
6-22-66-2
Bellier A.
Alvarez Varona N.
3-66-36-1
Furness E.
Zuk K.
4-66-37-67
Bergs Z.[4]
Rincon D.
6-36-2
Popko D.
Uchida K.[6]
5-76-46-2
Shelbayh A.
Stricker D.[1]
6-27-5
Menendez Maceiras A.
Glinka D.
6-43-66-3
Vukic A.[3]
Lokoli L.
1-66-17-61
Riedi L.
Olivetti A.
3-66-46-4
Peniston R.[2]
Vallejo A.
6-16-2
Celikbilek A.
Gengel M.
6-36-4
Lazarov A.
Medjedovic H.
6-16-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Masur D.[9]
3-67-616-3