Felix Auger Aliassime vs Jannik Sinner — Cincinnati Masters Round of 16

Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 16
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN7
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1932Hard ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 August 2022
hard
Jannik Sinner
ITA10
Jannik Sinner
#1ATP
2320ELO
2263Hard ELO
$6.9MYTD
$65MCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWLWWW
Auger Aliassime F.
2-6 7-6 6-1
Sinner J.
Auger Aliassime F.
27762
Sinner J.
66111

Felix Auger Aliassime defeated Jannik Sinner 2-6 7-6 6-1 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jannik Sinner came in ranked #1, leading the head-to-head 5–1, defending last year's round of 32. Felix Auger Aliassime narrowed the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-04-05Monte Carlo MastersQFclayJannik Sinner6-3 6-4
2025-11-09Tour FinalsRRhardJannik Sinner7-5 6-1
2025-10-27Paris MastersFhardJannik Sinner6-4 7-6(4)
2025-08-25US OpenSFhardJannik Sinner6-1 3-6 6-3 6-4
2025-08-07Cincinnati MastersQFhardJannik Sinner6-0 6-2
2022-05-02Madrid MastersR16clayFelix Auger Aliassime6-1 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Auger Aliassime F.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sinner J.

Sinner J.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Auger Aliassime F.Sinner J.
74
Serve
100
44
Return
100

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Auger Aliassime F.Sinner J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
79%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
58%
Service points won·Even
68%
71%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
74%
Aces / match·Clear edge
9.3
7.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Auger Aliassime F.Sinner J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
84
100
Break points saved·Even
100
100
Break points won·Dominant
50
100
Deciding sets·Even
99
100
Tiebreaks·Even
99
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Auger Aliassime F.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Sinner J.
8.3
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.0Hard Elo 1932
Surface ELO
9.0+331 Hard Elo edge
0.7Overall Elo 1958
ELO gap
9.3Overall Elo 2320
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
6.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.5
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
5.5
Country comfort
6.5
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Auger Aliassime F.Sinner J.
Freshness·Even
59
59

Auger Aliassime F.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 112 games (7d) · Sinner J.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 95 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
23°CMainly clear
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 70%
Final
Coric B.
Tsitsipas S.[4]
7-606-2
Semi-finals
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Medvedev D.[1]
7-663-66-3
Coric B.
Norrie C.[9]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Medvedev D.[1]
Fritz T.[11]
7-616-3
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Isner J.
7-655-76-3
Coric B.
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
6-46-4
Norrie C.[9]
Alcaraz C.[3]
7-646-746-4
R16
Medvedev D.[1]
Shapovalov D.
7-57-5
Fritz T.[11]
Rublev A.[6]
6-746-27-5
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Schwartzman D.[13]
6-36-3
Isner J.
Korda S.
7-631-67-64
Norrie C.[9]
Shelton B.
6-06-2
Alcaraz C.[3]
Cilic M.[14]
7-646-1
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
Sinner J.[10]
2-67-616-1
Coric B.
Bautista Agut R.[15]
6-26-3
R32
Medvedev D.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-47-5
Shapovalov D.
Paul T.
3-66-46-3
Rublev A.[6]
Fognini F.
6-777-636-2
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Krajinovic F.
6-36-4
Korda S.
Tiafoe F.
4-66-16-4
Isner J.
Hurkacz H.[8]
7-656-756-2
Shelton B.
Ruud C.[5]
6-36-3
Norrie C.[9]
Murray A.
3-66-36-4
Cilic M.[14]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-757-5
Alcaraz C.[3]
Mcdonald M.
6-36-2
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
De Minaur A.
6-36-2
Bautista Agut R.[15]
Giron M.
6-36-3
Sinner J.[10]
Kecmanovic M.
7-53-1
Coric B.
Nadal R.[2]
7-694-66-3
Fritz T.[11]
Kyrgios N.
6-36-2
Schwartzman D.[13]
Karatsev A.
7-633-66-2
R64
Murray A.
Wawrinka S.
7-635-77-5
Kyrgios N.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-56-4
Tiafoe F.
Berrettini M.[12]
7-634-67-65
Korda S.
Khachanov K.
6-36-4
Isner J.
Bonzi B.
7-6113-67-64
Shelton B.
Sonego L.
7-653-67-5
Norrie C.[9]
Rune H.
7-654-66-4
Cilic M.[14]
Munar J.
6-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Wolf J.
7-626-2
Mcdonald M.
Basilashvili N.
6-06-1
De Minaur A.
Laaksonen H.
6-26-2
Kecmanovic M.
Carreno Busta P.
1-67-57-64
Sinner J.[10]
Kokkinakis T.
6-796-47-66
Bautista Agut R.[15]
Cerundolo F.
6-756-46-2
Giron M.
Goffin D.
6-36-4
Coric B.
Musetti L.
7-626-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Cressy M.
6-24-66-4
Shapovalov D.
Dimitrov G.[16]
7-646-3
Fritz T.[11]
Baez S.
6-16-1
Fognini F.
Ramos A.
6-26-3
Krajinovic F.
Evans D.
6-36-4
Karatsev A.
Nakashima B.
7-57-5
Schwartzman D.[13]
Molcan A.
5-76-46-2
Paul T.
Brooksby J.
6-36-2