Felix Auger Aliassime vs Jannik Sinner — Madrid Masters Round of 16

Madrid Masters · ATP · Round of 16
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN8
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1864Clay ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 May 2022
clay
Jannik Sinner
ITA10
Jannik Sinner
#1ATP
2320ELO
2216Clay ELO
$6.9MYTD
$65MCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWLWWW
Auger Aliassime F.
6-1 6-2
Sinner J.
Auger Aliassime F.
662
Sinner J.
120

Felix Auger Aliassime defeated Jannik Sinner 6-1 6-2 in the Madrid Masters round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jannik Sinner came in ranked #1, leading the head-to-head 5–1, defending last year's round of 32. Felix Auger Aliassime narrowed the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-04-05Monte Carlo MastersQFclayJannik Sinner6-3 6-4
2025-11-09Tour FinalsRRhardJannik Sinner7-5 6-1
2025-10-27Paris MastersFhardJannik Sinner6-4 7-6(4)
2025-08-25US OpenSFhardJannik Sinner6-1 3-6 6-3 6-4
2025-08-07Cincinnati MastersQFhardJannik Sinner6-0 6-2
2022-08-15Cincinnati MastersR16hardFelix Auger Aliassime2-6 7-6(1) 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Auger Aliassime F.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sinner J.

Sinner J.serving92% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Serve advantage — Sinner J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Auger Aliassime F.Sinner J.
—
Serve
99
—
Return
91

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Auger Aliassime F.Sinner J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
79%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
58%
Service points won·Even
68%
71%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
74%
Aces / match·Clear edge
9.4
7.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Auger Aliassime F.Sinner J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
84
100
Break points saved·Even
100
100
Break points won·Dominant
50
100
Deciding sets·Even
99
100
Tiebreaks·Even
99
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Auger Aliassime F.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Sinner J.
8.1
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.6Clay Elo 1864
Surface ELO
9.4+352 Clay Elo edge
0.7Overall Elo 1958
ELO gap
9.3Overall Elo 2320
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
6.8
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Auger Aliassime F.Sinner J.
Freshness·Even
59
59

Auger Aliassime F.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 112 games (7d) · Sinner J.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 95 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
16°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 66%
Final
Alcaraz C.[7]
Zverev A.[2]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[7]
Djokovic N.[1]
6-757-57-65
Zverev A.[2]
Tsitsipas S.[4]
6-43-66-2
Quarter-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Hurkacz H.[12]
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.[7]
Nadal R.[3]
6-21-66-3
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Rublev A.[6]
6-32-66-4
Zverev A.[2]
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
6-37-5
R16
Djokovic N.[1]
Murray A.
W/O
Zverev A.[2]
Musetti L.
6-31-0
Hurkacz H.[12]
Lajovic D.
7-56-3
Nadal R.[3]
Goffin D.
6-35-77-69
Alcaraz C.[7]
Norrie C.[9]
6-46-746-3
Rublev A.[6]
Evans D.
7-677-5
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Dimitrov G.
6-36-4
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Sinner J.[10]
6-16-2
R32
Goffin D.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-46-2
Zverev A.[2]
Cilic M.
4-66-46-4
Djokovic N.[1]
Monfils G.
6-36-2
Murray A.
Shapovalov D.[14]
6-13-66-2
Hurkacz H.[12]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-44-67-65
Lajovic D.
Ruud C.[5]
7-672-66-4
Nadal R.[3]
Kecmanovic M.
6-17-64
Norrie C.[9]
Isner J.
6-46-756-4
Alcaraz C.[7]
Basilashvili N.
6-37-5
Rublev A.[6]
Draper J.
2-66-47-5
Evans D.
Bautista Agut R.[17]
6-35-77-62
Dimitrov G.
Schwartzman D.[13]
6-06-3
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Pouille L.
6-36-4
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Garin C.
6-36-0
Sinner J.[10]
De Minaur A.
6-46-1
Musetti L.
Korda S.
6-46-3
R64
Hurkacz H.[12]
Dellien H.
7-56-7116-3
Murray A.
Thiem D.
6-36-4
Dimitrov G.
Cressy M.
6-27-64
Schwartzman D.[13]
Paire B.
6-26-756-1
Evans D.
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Monfils G.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-36-0
Shapovalov D.[14]
Humbert U.
7-616-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Harris L.
7-56-3
Lajovic D.
Coric B.
6-34-66-4
Kecmanovic M.
Bublik A.
6-47-5
Goffin D.
Karatsev A.
6-27-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Carreno Busta P.[16]
6-767-616-3
Norrie C.[9]
Kwon S.
7-57-5
Isner J.
Krajinovic F.
7-686-4
Basilashvili N.
Fognini F.
7-56-4
Draper J.
Sonego L.
6-46-3
Bautista Agut R.[17]
Brooksby J.
6-06-2
Pouille L.
Khachanov K.
6-36-4
Garin C.
Tiafoe F.
6-16-3
De Minaur A.
Martinez P.
7-621-66-3
Sinner J.[10]
Paul T.
6-747-646-3
Korda S.
Opelka R.[15]
6-37-5
Musetti L.
Ivashka I.
2-66-37-5
Cilic M.
Ramos A.
6-33-66-4