Alex De Minaur vs Denis Shapovalov — Canada Masters Round of 64

Canada Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Alex De Minaur
AUS
Alex De Minaur
#6ATP
1961ELO
1935Hard ELO
$2.4MYTD
$25MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 August 2022
hard
Denis Shapovalov
CAN
Denis Shapovalov
#41ATP
1771ELO
1775Hard ELO
$749kYTD
$15MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWWL
De Minaur A.
7-5 7-6
Shapovalov D.
De Minaur A.
7772
Shapovalov D.
5640

Alex De Minaur defeated Denis Shapovalov 7-5 7-6 in the Canada Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Alex De Minaur came in ranked #6, leading the head-to-head 5–0, defending last year's round of 32. Alex De Minaur extended the head-to-head to 6–0.

Key context

Head to head

5–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-06-17LondonR16grassAlex De Minaur6-4 6-1
2025-04-23Madrid MastersR32clayAlex De Minaur6-3 7-6(3)
2022-10-17StockholmQFhardAlex De Minaur6-2 7-6(4)
2020-01-06Atp CupRRhardAlex De Minaur6-7(6) 6-4 6-2
2019-11-21Davis Cup Finals QF: AUS vs CANRRhardAlex De Minaur3-6 6-3 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
De Minaur A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Shapovalov D.

Shapovalov D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs De Minaur A.

Serve advantage — De Minaur A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

De Minaur A.Shapovalov D.
48
Serve
25
80
Return
70

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Minaur A.Shapovalov D.
1st serve in·Even
56%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
8.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
6.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Minaur A.Shapovalov D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
95
85
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Dominant
97
71
Deciding sets·Slight edge
97
92
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Minaur A.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Shapovalov D.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+160 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1775
7.2Overall Elo 1961
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1771
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.9
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
Minutes 14d
8.6
0.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Country comfort
7.7
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Minaur A.Shapovalov D.
Freshness·Clear edge
77
98

De Minaur A.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d) · Shapovalov D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
27°CDrizzle
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 72%
Final
Carreno Busta P.
Hurkacz H.[8]
3-66-36-3
Semi-finals
Hurkacz H.[8]
Ruud C.[4]
5-76-36-2
Carreno Busta P.
Evans D.
7-56-776-2
Quarter-finals
Hurkacz H.[8]
Kyrgios N.
7-646-756-1
Ruud C.[4]
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
6-16-2
Carreno Busta P.
Draper J.
7-646-1
Evans D.
Paul T.
1-66-36-4
R16
Kyrgios N.
De Minaur A.
6-26-3
Hurkacz H.[8]
Ramos A.
6-766-27-63
Ruud C.[4]
Bautista Agut R.[14]
6-747-646-4
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Norrie C.[9]
6-36-4
Carreno Busta P.
Sinner J.[7]
6-26-4
Evans D.
Fritz T.[10]
7-651-67-5
Paul T.
Cilic M.[13]
6-46-2
Draper J.
Monfils G.[17]
6-20-2
R32
Kyrgios N.
Medvedev D.[1]
6-726-46-2
De Minaur A.
Dimitrov G.[15]
7-647-5
Ramos A.
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-46-2
Hurkacz H.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-36-746-2
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Nishioka Y.
7-666-4
Sinner J.[7]
Mannarino A.
2-66-46-2
Carreno Busta P.
Rune H.
6-06-3
Draper J.
Tsitsipas S.[3]
7-57-64
Evans D.
Rublev A.[5]
6-46-4
Fritz T.[10]
Tiafoe F.
5-76-16-4
Monfils G.[17]
Cressy M.
7-6107-66
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Brooksby J.
7-56-1
Paul T.
Alcaraz C.[2]
6-747-676-3
Ruud C.[4]
Molcan A.
7-636-3
Norrie C.[9]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-16-2
Cilic M.[13]
Khachanov K.
6-36-2
R64
Cressy M.
Karatsev A.
6-46-4
Kyrgios N.
Baez S.
6-46-4
De Minaur A.
Shapovalov D.
7-57-64
Dimitrov G.[15]
Galarneau A.
6-47-5
Schwartzman D.[12]
Davidovich Fokina A.
1-66-36-4
Ramos A.
Goffin D.
7-626-2
Molcan A.
Mcdonald M.
7-616-4
Brooksby J.
Bublik A.
6-26-3
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Giron M.
7-656-3
Norrie C.[9]
Nakashima B.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kecmanovic M.
6-17-5
Nishioka Y.
Paire B.
6-26-3
Mannarino A.
Rinderknech A.
6-36-3
Carreno Busta P.
Berrettini M.[11]
6-36-2
Monfils G.[17]
Martinez P.
7-643-66-2
Draper J.
Gaston H.
6-26-3
Evans D.
Krajinovic F.
6-21-66-0
Tiafoe F.
Bonzi B.
6-767-56-3
Fritz T.[10]
Murray A.
6-16-3
Cilic M.[13]
Coric B.
6-36-2
Khachanov K.
Cerundolo F.
7-645-76-3
Paul T.
Pospisil V.
6-46-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Wawrinka S.
6-33-66-3
Rune H.
Fognini F.
6-37-5