Maxime Cressy vs Reilly Opelka — Eastbourne Round of 32

Eastbourne · ATP · Round of 32
USA
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 June 2022
grass
Reilly Opelka
USA5
Reilly Opelka
#115ATP
1749ELO
1635Grass ELO
$325kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 211 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
Cressy M.
6-3 6-1
Opelka R.
Cressy M.
662
Opelka R.
310

Maxime Cressy defeated Reilly Opelka 6-3 6-1 in the Eastbourne round of 32 on grass. Maxime Cressy extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-03MelbourneR16hardMaxime Cressy4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(9)

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving98% hold

wins 81% of points on serve vs Opelka R.

Opelka R.serving98% hold

wins 80% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Opelka R.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
79%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
68%
70%
Return points won·Even
32%
29%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
72%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.4
16.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
9.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (179 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Opelka R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
63
Break points saved·Even
96
100
Break points won·Even
2
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cressy M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Opelka R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
2.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
9.3
0.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fritz T.[3]
Cressy M.
6-26-747-64
Semi-finals
Fritz T.[3]
De Minaur A.[6]
6-16-756-3
Cressy M.
Draper J.
7-656-726-3
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.
Norrie C.[1]
7-57-5
De Minaur A.[6]
Paul T.
6-24-66-4
Draper J.
Peniston R.
6-36-3
Fritz T.[3]
Bublik A.
6-36-2
R16
Norrie C.[1]
Nakashima B.
6-46-2
Bublik A.
Millman J.
6-46-2
De Minaur A.[6]
Sonego L.
7-636-2
Paul T.
Sinner J.[2]
6-33-66-3
Fritz T.[3]
Monteiro T.
7-56-3
Cressy M.
Evans D.
7-626-4
Peniston R.
Martinez P.
7-683-66-3
Draper J.
Schwartzman D.[4]
7-57-63
R32
Martinez P.
Davidovich Fokina A.
1-67-660-0
Nakashima B.
Clarke J.
6-16-3
Peniston R.
Rune H.[8]
4-67-656-1
Monteiro T.
Humbert U.
6-726-36-4
Paul T.
Cerundolo F.
4-67-626-4
Sonego L.
Duckworth J.
4-67-657-61
De Minaur A.[6]
Garin C.
6-36-3
Bublik A.
Tiafoe F.[7]
5-77-646-0
Evans D.
Mannarino A.
6-46-3
Millman J.
Korda S.
6-37-65
Draper J.
Brooksby J.
6-26-2
Cressy M.
Opelka R.[5]
6-36-1