Maxime Cressy vs Reilly Opelka — Melbourne Round of 16

Melbourne · ATP · Round of 16
USA
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
Reilly Opelka
USA2
Reilly Opelka
#131ATP
1749ELO
1734Hard ELO
$325kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 211 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
Cressy M.
4-6 7-6 7-6
Opelka R.
Cressy M.
4777112
Opelka R.
665691

Maxime Cressy defeated Reilly Opelka 4-6 7-6 7-6 in the Melbourne round of 16 on hard. Maxime Cressy extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-06-20EastbourneR32grassMaxime Cressy6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving97% hold

wins 78% of points on serve vs Opelka R.

Opelka R.serving96% hold

wins 77% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cressy M.Opelka R.
—
Serve
86
—
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Opelka R.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
79%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
68%
70%
Return points won·Even
32%
29%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
72%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.3
16.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
9.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (179 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Opelka R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
63
Break points saved·Even
96
100
Break points won·Even
2
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cressy M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Opelka R.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 38 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
2.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nadal R.[1]
Cressy M.
7-666-3
Semi-finals
Cressy M.
Dimitrov G.[3]
7-57-69
Nadal R.[1]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Nadal R.[1]
Griekspoor T.
W/O
Dimitrov G.[3]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-756-07-5
Cressy M.
Munar J.
7-636-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Molcan A.
6-26-1
R16
Molcan A.
Goffin D.[4]
7-56-3
Griekspoor T.
Popyrin A.
6-34-66-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mcdonald M.[8]
6-27-5
Cressy M.
Opelka R.[2]
4-67-657-69
Munar J.
Laaksonen H.
6-17-5
Dimitrov G.[3]
Bagnis F.
5-77-636-3
Nadal R.[1]
Berankis R.
6-27-5
Ruusuvuori E.
Thompson J.
7-635-76-3
R32
Laaksonen H.
Paire B.[5]
4-66-35-2
Munar J.
Anderson K.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.[8]
Gojowczyk P.
6-06-3
Thompson J.
Oconnell C.
1-67-56-4
Griekspoor T.
Koepfer D.[7]
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mannarino A.
6-46-3
Berankis R.
Giron M.
7-56-4
Molcan A.
Seppi A.
6-46-766-3
Popyrin A.
Travaglia S.
7-656-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Baez S.
7-626-1
Bagnis F.
Murray A.
6-35-76-3
Cressy M.
Hijikata R.
6-36-0