Jordan Thompson vs Denis Kudla — Surbiton CH Final

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Jordan Thompson
AUS8
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
grass
USA7
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Thompson J.
7-5 6-3
Kudla D.
Thompson J.
762
Kudla D.
530

Jordan Thompson defeated Denis Kudla 7-5 6-3 in the Surbiton CH final on grass. The result followed the form book — Jordan Thompson came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

Head to head

3–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-05DallasR16hardJordan Thompson6-1 6-1
2023-02-13Delray BeachR32hardDenis Kudla3-6 6-4 7-6(2)
2023-02-06DallasR32hardJordan Thompson6-1 7-5
2019-05-20GenevaR32clayDenis Kudla5-7 6-2 6-4
2017-06-19Queen's ClubQ1grassJordan Thompson5-7 7-6(7) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Kudla D.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Kudla D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 167). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Kudla D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
90
Break points won·Slight edge
24
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
91
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Kudla D.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
6.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Kudla D.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Virtanen O.
6-31-66-4
Kudla D.[7]
Murray A.[1]
5-77-646-3
Quarter-finals
Virtanen O.
Peniston R.
6-716-37-66
Murray A.[1]
Nakashima B.[5]
6-47-61
Kudla D.[7]
Purcell M.
6-47-64
Thompson J.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-26-3
R16
Kudla D.[7]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Jubb P.
2-67-56-3
Purcell M.
Herbert P.
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Gray A.
6-37-65
Peniston R.
Draper J.
6-797-56-4
Murray A.[1]
Brouwer G.
7-647-63
R32
Ramanathan R.
Sugita Y.
4-67-57-62
Purcell M.
Querrey S.
6-47-65
Thompson J.[8]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Murray A.[1]
Rodionov J.
6-26-1
Brouwer G.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Moraing M.
6-37-64
Virtanen O.
Kokkinakis T.[9]
6-37-65
Kudla D.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-53-66-3
Oconnell C.
Kwon S.[3]
4-66-46-3
Peniston R.
Mannarino A.[2]
2-66-16-4
Draper J.
Harris B.
6-26-2
Jubb P.
Kukushkin M.
6-47-69
Gray A.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Clarke J.
4-66-36-2
Herbert P.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-756-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-6106-2