Jordan Thompson vs Denis Kudla — Dallas Round of 16

Dallas · ATP · Round of 16
Jordan Thompson
AUS7
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
USA
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Thompson J.
6-1 6-1
Kudla D.
Thompson J.
662
Kudla D.
110

Jordan Thompson defeated Denis Kudla 6-1 6-1 in the Dallas round of 16 on hard. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-13Delray BeachR32hardDenis Kudla3-6 6-4 7-6(2)
2023-02-06DallasR32hardJordan Thompson6-1 7-5
2019-05-20GenevaR32clayDenis Kudla5-7 6-2 6-4
2017-06-19Queen's ClubQ1grassJordan Thompson5-7 7-6(7) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Kudla D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Kudla D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.2
6.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (95 vs 44). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Kudla D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
90
Break points won·Slight edge
24
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
91
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kudla D.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
4.6
H2H
5.4
5.2
Surface form
6.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.4
3-set count
4.0
0.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Paul T.[2]
Giron M.
7-635-76-3
Semi-finals
Paul T.[2]
Shelton B.[3]
6-26-4
Giron M.
Mannarino A.[4]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Paul T.[2]
Koepfer D.[8]
7-56-3
Mannarino A.[4]
Duckworth J.
6-23-1
Giron M.
Tiafoe F.[1]
6-16-4
Shelton B.[3]
Thompson J.[7]
6-726-46-4
R16
Duckworth J.
Eubanks C.[5]
7-636-4
Thompson J.[7]
Kudla D.
6-16-1
Mannarino A.[4]
Nishioka Y.
W/O
Paul T.[2]
Daniel T.
6-36-2
Shelton B.[3]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
Koepfer D.[8]
Hijikata R.
6-37-65
Tiafoe F.[1]
Michelsen A.
6-46-3
Giron M.
Purcell M.[6]
6-46-3
R32
Daniel T.
Lestienne C.
4-66-45-0
Nishioka Y.
Atmane T.
7-654-66-3
Hijikata R.
Quinn E.
6-46-4
Giron M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-4
Purcell M.[6]
Krueger M.
6-24-67-63
Eubanks C.[5]
Johnson S.
6-16-4
Kudla D.
Albot R.
6-37-63
Koepfer D.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-65
Michelsen A.
Sandgren T.
6-33-66-1
Duckworth J.
Svajda Z.
7-636-1
Thompson J.[7]
Neff A.
6-36-1
Mmoh M.
Nava E.
7-56-2