Jessica Pegula vs Sara Sorribes Tormo — Madrid Quarter-final

Madrid · WTA · Quarter-final
Jessica Pegula
USA12
Jessica Pegula
#4WTA
2097ELO
1941Clay ELO
$2.8MYTD
$25MCAREER
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Thursday, 28 April 2022
clay
Sara Sorribes Tormo
ESP
Sara Sorribes Tormo
#253WTA
1664ELO
1651Clay ELO
29 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
Pegula J.
6-4 6-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Pegula J.
662
Sorribes Tormo S.
420

Jessica Pegula defeated Sara Sorribes Tormo 6-4 6-2 in the Madrid quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Jessica Pegula came in ranked #4, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. Jessica Pegula extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-07-01WimbledonR64grassJessica Pegula7.8-6.6 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Pegula J.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Sorribes Tormo S.

Sorribes Tormo S.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Pegula J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Pegula J.Sorribes Tormo S.
67
Serve
—
22
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Pegula J.Sorribes Tormo S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
72%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
57%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
53%
Return points won·Even
45%
48%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
0.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 175). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pegula J.Sorribes Tormo S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
96
34
Break points saved·Dominant
96
19
Break points won·Even
99
99
Deciding sets·Clear edge
100
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pegula J.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Sorribes Tormo S.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.7+291 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Clay Elo 1651
10.0Overall Elo 2097
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1664
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
5.6
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Country comfort
5.7
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Pegula J.Sorribes Tormo S.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
96

Pegula J.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 54 games (7d) · Sorribes Tormo S.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
13°CDrizzle
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 75%

Draw

Final
Jabeur O.[8]
Pegula J.[12]
7-50-66-2
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[12]
Teichmann J.
6-36-4
Jabeur O.[8]
Alexandrova E.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Alexandrova E.
Anisimova A.
6-46-3
Teichmann J.
Kalinina A.
6-36-4
Pegula J.[12]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-46-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Halep S.
6-36-2
R16
Halep S.
Gauff C.[14]
6-46-4
Teichmann J.
Rybakina E.[16]
6-36-1
Kalinina A.
Raducanu E.[9]
6-22-66-4
Pegula J.[12]
Andreescu B.
7-56-1
Alexandrova E.
Bouzkova M.
6-746-07-5
Anisimova A.
Azarenka V.[15]
6-16-4
Sorribes Tormo S.
Kasatkina D.
6-41-66-3
Jabeur O.[8]
Bencic B.[11]
6-23-66-2
R32
Rybakina E.[16]
Siniakova K.
6-01-0
Raducanu E.[9]
Kostyuk M.
6-26-1
Bouzkova M.
Yastremska D.
3-67-636-1
Azarenka V.[15]
Zidansek T.
3-66-16-3
Anisimova A.
Martic P.
3-66-36-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Gracheva V.
7-50-66-4
Bencic B.[11]
Muchova K.
6-34-67-5
Halep S.
Badosa P.[2]
6-36-1
Kasatkina D.
Sakkari M.[4]
3-66-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Kanepi K.
6-36-3
Gauff C.[14]
Putintseva Y.
6-12-66-4
Teichmann J.
Fernandez L.[17]
6-46-4
Kalinina A.
Muguruza G.[7]
6-36-0
Sorribes Tormo S.
Osaka N.
6-36-1
Andreescu B.
Collins D.[6]
6-16-1
Alexandrova E.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-47-5
R64
Muchova K.
Zheng Q.
1-66-36-4
Zidansek T.
Haddad Maia B.
6-26-3
Kanepi K.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.[16]
Dodin O.
6-27-5
Collins D.[6]
Puig M.
7-56-0
Anisimova A.
Sabalenka A.[3]
6-23-66-4
Kalinina A.
Stephens S.
7-56-4
Fernandez L.[17]
Petkovic A.
6-11-66-4
Muguruza G.[7]
Tomljanovic A.
7-56-2
Sakkari M.[4]
Keys M.
6-786-36-4
Kasatkina D.
Bondar A.
4-66-46-3
Osaka N.
Potapova A.
6-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Giorgi C.
7-52-67-5
Andreescu B.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-43-66-0
Bouzkova M.
Pliskova K.[5]
6-47-5
Parrizas Diaz N.
Cirstea S.
6-46-2
Alexandrova E.
Ostapenko J.[10]
6-24-66-4
Azarenka V.[15]
Golubic V.
7-656-3
Martic P.
Samsonova L.
7-666-1
Jabeur O.[8]
Paolini J.
7-696-1
Gracheva V.
Cornet A.
1-67-57-5
Gauff C.[14]
Schmiedlova A.
6-06-2
Halep S.
Zhang S.
6-26-3
Badosa P.[2]
Kudermetova V.
6-36-0
Teichmann J.
Kvitova P.
6-37-5
Raducanu E.[9]
Martincova T.
7-636-0
Kostyuk M.
Tauson C.
6-36-2
Yastremska D.
Minnen G.
6-30-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[13]
6-32-66-3
Bencic B.[11]
Begu I.
6-46-1
Putintseva Y.
Rogers S.
7-57-5
Siniakova K.
Konjuh A.
0-66-46-2