Ons Jabeur vs Jessica Pegula — Madrid Final

Madrid · WTA · Final
TUN8
Ons Jabeur
31 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Thursday, 28 April 2022
clay
Jessica Pegula
USA12
Jessica Pegula
#3WTA
2097ELO
1941Clay ELO
$2.8MYTD
$25MCAREER
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
Jabeur O.
7-5 0-6 6-2
Pegula J.
Jabeur O.
7062
Pegula J.
5621

Ons Jabeur defeated Jessica Pegula 7-5 0-6 6-2 in the Madrid final on clay. The result followed the form book — Ons Jabeur came in leading the head-to-head 3–2, defending last year's round of 16. Ons Jabeur extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Ons Jabeur closed it out in three sets, 7–5 0–6 6–2.

Head to head

3–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-10-31Fort Worth FinalsRRhardOns Jabeur1-6 6-3 6-3
2022-02-14DubaiR16hardOns Jabeur6-3 6-1
2021-09-27Chicago 2R16hardOns Jabeur1-6 6-2 6-3
2021-08-09MontrealQFhardJessica Pegula1-6 7-6(4) 6-0
2018-09-10Quebec CityR16hardJessica Pegula7-6(3) 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Jabeur O.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Pegula J.

Pegula J.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Jabeur O.

Serve advantage — Pegula J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Jabeur O.Pegula J.
—
Serve
67
—
Return
22

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jabeur O.Pegula J.
1st serve in·Even
57%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (176 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jabeur O.Pegula J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
90
96
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
96
Break points won·Even
96
99
Deciding sets·Slight edge
95
100
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
90
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jabeur O.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pegula J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
5.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jabeur O.Pegula J.
Freshness·
—
79

Pegula J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
13°CDrizzle
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 75%

Draw

Final
Jabeur O.[8]
Pegula J.[12]
7-50-66-2
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[12]
Teichmann J.
6-36-4
Jabeur O.[8]
Alexandrova E.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Alexandrova E.
Anisimova A.
6-46-3
Teichmann J.
Kalinina A.
6-36-4
Pegula J.[12]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-46-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Halep S.
6-36-2
R16
Halep S.
Gauff C.[14]
6-46-4
Teichmann J.
Rybakina E.[16]
6-36-1
Kalinina A.
Raducanu E.[9]
6-22-66-4
Pegula J.[12]
Andreescu B.
7-56-1
Alexandrova E.
Bouzkova M.
6-746-07-5
Anisimova A.
Azarenka V.[15]
6-16-4
Sorribes Tormo S.
Kasatkina D.
6-41-66-3
Jabeur O.[8]
Bencic B.[11]
6-23-66-2
R32
Rybakina E.[16]
Siniakova K.
6-01-0
Raducanu E.[9]
Kostyuk M.
6-26-1
Bouzkova M.
Yastremska D.
3-67-636-1
Azarenka V.[15]
Zidansek T.
3-66-16-3
Anisimova A.
Martic P.
3-66-36-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Gracheva V.
7-50-66-4
Bencic B.[11]
Muchova K.
6-34-67-5
Halep S.
Badosa P.[2]
6-36-1
Kasatkina D.
Sakkari M.[4]
3-66-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Kanepi K.
6-36-3
Gauff C.[14]
Putintseva Y.
6-12-66-4
Teichmann J.
Fernandez L.[17]
6-46-4
Kalinina A.
Muguruza G.[7]
6-36-0
Sorribes Tormo S.
Osaka N.
6-36-1
Andreescu B.
Collins D.[6]
6-16-1
Alexandrova E.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-47-5
R64
Muchova K.
Zheng Q.
1-66-36-4
Zidansek T.
Haddad Maia B.
6-26-3
Kanepi K.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.[16]
Dodin O.
6-27-5
Collins D.[6]
Puig M.
7-56-0
Anisimova A.
Sabalenka A.[3]
6-23-66-4
Kalinina A.
Stephens S.
7-56-4
Fernandez L.[17]
Petkovic A.
6-11-66-4
Muguruza G.[7]
Tomljanovic A.
7-56-2
Sakkari M.[4]
Keys M.
6-786-36-4
Kasatkina D.
Bondar A.
4-66-46-3
Osaka N.
Potapova A.
6-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Giorgi C.
7-52-67-5
Andreescu B.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-43-66-0
Bouzkova M.
Pliskova K.[5]
6-47-5
Parrizas Diaz N.
Cirstea S.
6-46-2
Alexandrova E.
Ostapenko J.[10]
6-24-66-4
Azarenka V.[15]
Golubic V.
7-656-3
Martic P.
Samsonova L.
7-666-1
Jabeur O.[8]
Paolini J.
7-696-1
Gracheva V.
Cornet A.
1-67-57-5
Gauff C.[14]
Schmiedlova A.
6-06-2
Halep S.
Zhang S.
6-26-3
Badosa P.[2]
Kudermetova V.
6-36-0
Teichmann J.
Kvitova P.
6-37-5
Raducanu E.[9]
Martincova T.
7-636-0
Kostyuk M.
Tauson C.
6-36-2
Yastremska D.
Minnen G.
6-30-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[13]
6-32-66-3
Bencic B.[11]
Begu I.
6-46-1
Putintseva Y.
Rogers S.
7-57-5
Siniakova K.
Konjuh A.
0-66-46-2