Ons Jabeur vs Jessica Pegula — Chicago 2 Round of 16

Chicago 2 · WTA · Round of 16
TUN6
Ons Jabeur
31 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 September 2021
hard
Jessica Pegula
USA9
Jessica Pegula
#3WTA
2097ELO
2058Hard ELO
$2.8MYTD
$25MCAREER
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
Jabeur O.
1-6 6-2 6-3
Pegula J.
Jabeur O.
1662
Pegula J.
6231

Ons Jabeur defeated Jessica Pegula 1-6 6-2 6-3 in the Chicago 2 round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ons Jabeur came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Ons Jabeur extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

Head to head

3–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-10-31Fort Worth FinalsRRhardOns Jabeur1-6 6-3 6-3
2022-04-28MadridFclayOns Jabeur7-5 0-6 6-2
2022-02-14DubaiR16hardOns Jabeur6-3 6-1
2021-08-09MontrealQFhardJessica Pegula1-6 7-6(4) 6-0
2018-09-10Quebec CityR16hardJessica Pegula7-6(3) 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Jabeur O.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Pegula J.

Pegula J.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jabeur O.

Serve advantage — Pegula J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jabeur O.Pegula J.
—
Serve
68
—
Return
73

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jabeur O.Pegula J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jabeur O.Pegula J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
90
96
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
96
Break points won·Even
96
99
Deciding sets·Slight edge
95
100
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
90
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jabeur O.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Pegula J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 42 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.3
Surface form
7.3
0.0
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jabeur O.Pegula J.
Freshness·
—
79

Pegula J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Muguruza G.[2]
Jabeur O.[6]
3-66-36-0
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[6]
Rybakina E.[5]
6-43-2
Muguruza G.[2]
Vondrousova M.
W/O
Quarter-finals
Vondrousova M.
Collins D.[10]
6-746-07-63
Jabeur O.[6]
Svitolina E.[1]
6-46-2
Muguruza G.[2]
Hontama M.
6-36-2
Rybakina E.[5]
Bencic B.[3]
6-43-1
R16
Muguruza G.[2]
Azarenka V.[14]
W/O
Svitolina E.[1]
Ruse E.
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[6]
Pegula J.[9]
1-66-26-3
Bencic B.[3]
Martincova T.
6-27-65
Rybakina E.[5]
Kudermetova V.[12]
7-647-5
Collins D.[10]
Mertens E.[7]
6-26-4
Vondrousova M.
Teichmann J.[16]
6-46-3
Hontama M.
Rogers S.
6-46-716-1
R32
Vondrousova M.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[4]
6-36-2
Teichmann J.[16]
Linette M.
6-26-4
Hontama M.
Kontaveit A.[11]
W/O
Svitolina E.[1]
Anisimova A.
6-46-3
Ruse E.
Baindl K.
7-56-2
Pegula J.[9]
Petkovic A.
6-27-5
Jabeur O.[6]
Hsieh S.
6-16-0
Bencic B.[3]
Inglis M.
5-76-16-0
Martincova T.
Zidansek T.[13]
6-27-5
Kudermetova V.[12]
Dart H.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.[5]
Sasnovich A.
6-46-4
Mertens E.[7]
Yastremska D.
6-16-3
Collins D.[10]
Doi M.
4-66-37-5
Rogers S.
Andreescu B.[8]
6-47-5
Azarenka V.[14]
Baptiste H.
6-24-66-3
Muguruza G.[2]
Li A.
6-46-4
R64
Baindl K.
Kostyuk M.
6-726-36-0
Doi M.
Bouzkova M.
6-36-746-3
Sasnovich A.
Keys M.
6-42-0
Hsieh S.
Clijsters K.
6-35-76-3
Petkovic A.
Govortsova O.
6-26-2
Vondrousova M.
Tomljanovic A.
6-26-1
Hontama M.
Garcia C.
6-36-0
Teichmann J.[16]
Kanepi K.
7-637-5
Ruse E.
Giorgi C.[15]
6-46-2
Anisimova A.
Golubic V.
6-05-76-4
Pegula J.[9]
Frech M.
6-36-0
Collins D.[10]
Flipkens K.
6-46-2
Inglis M.
Dolehide C.
4-66-26-4
Zidansek T.[13]
Stephens S.
6-26-1
Dart H.
Haddad Maia B.
6-13-66-1
Linette M.
Vandeweghe C.
6-16-4
Rogers S.
Cabrera L.
6-26-1
Kontaveit A.[11]
Brengle M.
6-46-3
Azarenka V.[14]
Zhang S.
6-26-1
Baptiste H.
Paolini J.
7-56-3
Li A.
Vekic D.
6-36-1
Kudermetova V.[12]
Kalinskaya A.
7-684-66-2
Martincova T.
Osorio C.
6-37-5
Yastremska D.
Cornet A.
7-56-1