Ons Jabeur vs Jasmine Paolini — Madrid Round of 64

Madrid · WTA · Round of 64
TUN8
Ons Jabeur
31 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Thursday, 28 April 2022
clay
Jasmine Paolini
ITA
Jasmine Paolini
#15WTA
1905ELO
1856Clay ELO
$1.3MYTD
$16MCAREER
30 yrs · 160 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
Jabeur O.
7-6 6-1
Paolini J.
Jabeur O.
71162
Paolini J.
6910

Ons Jabeur defeated Jasmine Paolini 7-6 6-1 in the Madrid round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jasmine Paolini came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Ons Jabeur narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Ons Jabeur came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-16BerlinR16grassOns Jabeur6-1 6-3
2025-05-06RomeR32clayJasmine Paolini6-4 6-3
2025-03-18MiamiR32hardJasmine Paolini4-3 RET
2024-04-15StuttgartR16clayJasmine Paolini7-6(8) 6-4
2023-06-26EastbourneR32grassOns Jabeur6-3 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Jabeur O.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Paolini J.

Paolini J.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Jabeur O.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jabeur O.Paolini J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
1.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (176 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jabeur O.Paolini J.
Clutch Rating·Even
90
89
Break points saved·Even
90
87
Break points won·Even
96
99
Deciding sets·Even
95
97
Tiebreaks·Even
90
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jabeur O.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Paolini J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
4.3
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.6
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jabeur O.Paolini J.
Freshness·
—
79

Paolini J.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 46 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
13°CDrizzle
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 75%

Draw

Final
Jabeur O.[8]
Pegula J.[12]
7-50-66-2
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[12]
Teichmann J.
6-36-4
Jabeur O.[8]
Alexandrova E.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Alexandrova E.
Anisimova A.
6-46-3
Teichmann J.
Kalinina A.
6-36-4
Pegula J.[12]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-46-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Halep S.
6-36-2
R16
Halep S.
Gauff C.[14]
6-46-4
Teichmann J.
Rybakina E.[16]
6-36-1
Kalinina A.
Raducanu E.[9]
6-22-66-4
Pegula J.[12]
Andreescu B.
7-56-1
Alexandrova E.
Bouzkova M.
6-746-07-5
Anisimova A.
Azarenka V.[15]
6-16-4
Sorribes Tormo S.
Kasatkina D.
6-41-66-3
Jabeur O.[8]
Bencic B.[11]
6-23-66-2
R32
Rybakina E.[16]
Siniakova K.
6-01-0
Raducanu E.[9]
Kostyuk M.
6-26-1
Bouzkova M.
Yastremska D.
3-67-636-1
Azarenka V.[15]
Zidansek T.
3-66-16-3
Anisimova A.
Martic P.
3-66-36-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Gracheva V.
7-50-66-4
Bencic B.[11]
Muchova K.
6-34-67-5
Halep S.
Badosa P.[2]
6-36-1
Kasatkina D.
Sakkari M.[4]
3-66-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Kanepi K.
6-36-3
Gauff C.[14]
Putintseva Y.
6-12-66-4
Teichmann J.
Fernandez L.[17]
6-46-4
Kalinina A.
Muguruza G.[7]
6-36-0
Sorribes Tormo S.
Osaka N.
6-36-1
Andreescu B.
Collins D.[6]
6-16-1
Alexandrova E.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-47-5
R64
Muchova K.
Zheng Q.
1-66-36-4
Zidansek T.
Haddad Maia B.
6-26-3
Kanepi K.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.[16]
Dodin O.
6-27-5
Collins D.[6]
Puig M.
7-56-0
Anisimova A.
Sabalenka A.[3]
6-23-66-4
Kalinina A.
Stephens S.
7-56-4
Fernandez L.[17]
Petkovic A.
6-11-66-4
Muguruza G.[7]
Tomljanovic A.
7-56-2
Sakkari M.[4]
Keys M.
6-786-36-4
Kasatkina D.
Bondar A.
4-66-46-3
Osaka N.
Potapova A.
6-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Giorgi C.
7-52-67-5
Andreescu B.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-43-66-0
Bouzkova M.
Pliskova K.[5]
6-47-5
Parrizas Diaz N.
Cirstea S.
6-46-2
Alexandrova E.
Ostapenko J.[10]
6-24-66-4
Azarenka V.[15]
Golubic V.
7-656-3
Martic P.
Samsonova L.
7-666-1
Jabeur O.[8]
Paolini J.
7-696-1
Gracheva V.
Cornet A.
1-67-57-5
Gauff C.[14]
Schmiedlova A.
6-06-2
Halep S.
Zhang S.
6-26-3
Badosa P.[2]
Kudermetova V.
6-36-0
Teichmann J.
Kvitova P.
6-37-5
Raducanu E.[9]
Martincova T.
7-636-0
Kostyuk M.
Tauson C.
6-36-2
Yastremska D.
Minnen G.
6-30-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[13]
6-32-66-3
Bencic B.[11]
Begu I.
6-46-1
Putintseva Y.
Rogers S.
7-57-5
Siniakova K.
Konjuh A.
0-66-46-2