Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Miomir KecmanovicMunich Semi-final

Munich · ATP · Semi-final
#54ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
clay
#50ATP
1768ELO
1733Clay ELO
$756kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWW
Van De Zandschulp B.
2-6 7-6 6-4
Kecmanovic M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
27762
Kecmanovic M.
66441

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Miomir Kecmanovic 2-6 7-6 6-4 in the Munich semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Miomir Kecmanovic came in ranked #50. Botic Van De Zandschulp extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

11
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-08Canada MastersR64hardBotic Van De Zandschulp6-1 7-5
2022-03-07Indian Wells MastersR32hardMiomir Kecmanovic7-6(3) 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kecmanovic M.

Kecmanovic M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Van De Zandschulp B.Kecmanovic M.
33
Serve
74
Return

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.6
4.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
77
66
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Even
68
67
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
56
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
80
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.6Clay Elo 1690
Surface ELO
4.4+43 Clay Elo edge
5.6Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1768
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
7.3
0.0
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Slight edge
87
94

Van De Zandschulp B.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Kecmanovic M.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
12°CDrizzle
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 64%