Miomir Kecmanovic vs Botic Van De ZandschulpIndian Wells Masters Round of 32

Indian Wells Masters · ATP · Round of 32
#59ATP
1768ELO
1709Hard ELO
$756kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 March 2022
hard
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Kecmanovic M.
7-6 7-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kecmanovic M.
7772
Van De Zandschulp B.
6350

Miomir Kecmanovic defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 7-6 7-5 in the Indian Wells Masters round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #55, leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 128. Miomir Kecmanovic claimed a first win over Botic Van De Zandschulp in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

02
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-08Canada MastersR64hardBotic Van De Zandschulp6-1 7-5
2022-04-25MunichSFclayBotic Van De Zandschulp2-6 7-6(4) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kecmanovic M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kecmanovic M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kecmanovic M.Van De Zandschulp B.
34
Serve
41
45
Return
43

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
66
77
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Even
67
68
Deciding sets·Clear edge
56
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
69
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1709
Surface ELO
5.5+2 Hard Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1768
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1743
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
8.6
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
5.2
Country comfort
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Slight edge
96
91

Kecmanovic M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
21°CClear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 10%