Alex De Minaur vs Ugo Humbert — Barcelona Round of 32

Barcelona · ATP · Round of 32
Alex De Minaur
AUS10
Alex De Minaur
#6ATP
1961ELO
1869Clay ELO
$2.4MYTD
$25MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
Ugo Humbert
FRA
Ugo Humbert
#30ATP
1868ELO
1732Clay ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
De Minaur A.
6-3 4-6 6-3
Humbert U.
De Minaur A.
6462
Humbert U.
3631

Alex De Minaur defeated Ugo Humbert 6-3 4-6 6-3 in the Barcelona round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Alex De Minaur came in ranked #6, leading the head-to-head 5–2, defending last year's round of 16. Alex De Minaur extended the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Alex De Minaur closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

5–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-09RotterdamSFhardAlex De Minaur6-4 6-3
2024-06-10s HertogenboschSFgrassAlex De Minaur7-6(4) 6-3
2023-09-14Davis Cup Finals RR: AUS vs FRARRhardAlex De Minaur7-6(2) 6-3
2023-07-24AtlantaQFhardUgo Humbert7-6(4) 6-3
2022-05-16LyonR16clayAlex De Minaur1-6 6-3 6-2
2022-01-03Atp CupRRhardAlex De Minaur3-6 7-6(2) 6-1
2020-10-19AntwerpFhardUgo Humbert6-1 7-6(4)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
De Minaur A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Humbert U.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs De Minaur A.

Serve advantage — De Minaur A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Minaur A.Humbert U.
—
Serve
—
39
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Minaur A.Humbert U.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Minaur A.Humbert U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
95
70
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Dominant
97
37
Deciding sets·Clear edge
97
78
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Minaur A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Humbert U.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+137 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Clay Elo 1732
6.6Overall Elo 1961
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1868
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
1.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Minaur A.Humbert U.
Freshness·Clear edge
73
90

De Minaur A.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 72 games (7d) · Humbert U.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
18°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 64%
Final
Alcaraz C.[5]
Carreno Busta P.[8]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[5]
De Minaur A.[10]
6-747-646-4
Carreno Busta P.[8]
Schwartzman D.[6]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Alcaraz C.[5]
Tsitsipas S.[1]
6-45-76-2
De Minaur A.[10]
Norrie C.[4]
6-35-76-1
Schwartzman D.[6]
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
3-66-26-3
Carreno Busta P.[8]
Ruud C.[2]
4-67-686-3
R16
De Minaur A.[10]
Harris L.
6-00-0
Tsitsipas S.[1]
Dimitrov G.[14]
6-16-4
Alcaraz C.[5]
Munar J.
6-36-3
Norrie C.[4]
Fucsovics M.
7-56-796-4
Schwartzman D.[6]
Musetti L.
6-47-5
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Tiafoe F.[13]
7-56-4
Carreno Busta P.[8]
Sonego L.[11]
6-25-76-2
Ruud C.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-2
R32
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Taberner C.
6-13-66-4
Tiafoe F.[13]
Dellien H.
7-636-1
Tsitsipas S.[1]
Ivashka I.
6-14-66-2
Dimitrov G.[14]
Coria F.
4-66-36-4
Munar J.
Basilashvili N.[9]
6-16-4
Alcaraz C.[5]
Kwon S.
6-12-66-2
Norrie C.[4]
Gerasimov E.
5-76-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Delbonis F.[15]
6-26-1
De Minaur A.[10]
Humbert U.
6-34-66-3
Harris L.
Ramos A.[17]
6-36-4
Schwartzman D.[6]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-2
Musetti L.
Evans D.[12]
6-47-68
Carreno Busta P.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-3
Sonego L.[11]
Ymer E.
6-46-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Bublik A.[16]
6-36-1
Ruud C.[2]
Nakashima B.
6-36-2
R64
Zapata Miralles B.
Robredo T.
6-16-1
Ymer E.
Cressy M.
6-36-0
Coria F.
Giron M.
6-23-66-1
Harris L.
Carballes Baena R.
6-47-60
Ivashka I.
Martinez P.
6-47-64
Munar J.
Moroni G.
6-26-4
Kwon S.
Paire B.
6-46-4
Gerasimov E.
Mannarino A.
2-66-36-4
Fucsovics M.
Thompson J.
6-46-2
Humbert U.
Andujar P.
6-46-3
Mcdonald M.
Grenier H.
6-726-17-62
Musetti L.
Baez S.
7-57-5
Dellien H.
Guinard M.
6-47-5
Taberner C.
Korda S.
6-36-0
Ruusuvuori E.
Lopez F.
6-06-1
Nakashima B.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-666-3