Casper Ruud vs Holger Rune — Monte Carlo Masters Round of 32

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Round of 32
Casper Ruud
NOR4
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
Holger Rune
DEN
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1729Clay ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Ruud C.
7-6 7-5
Rune H.
Ruud C.
7772
Rune H.
6550

Casper Ruud defeated Holger Rune 7-6 7-5 in the Monte Carlo Masters round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13, leading the head-to-head 5–2, defending last year's semi-final. Casper Ruud extended the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

Head to head

5–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-04-14BarcelonaQFclayHolger Rune6-4 6-2
2024-02-26AcapulcoSFhardCasper Ruud3-6 6-3 6-4
2023-05-29Roland GarrosQFclayCasper Ruud6-1 6-2 3-6 6-3
2023-05-08Rome MastersSFclayHolger Rune6-7(2) 6-4 6-2
2022-05-23Roland GarrosQFclayCasper Ruud6-1 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3
2021-07-12BastadR16clayCasper Ruud6-0 6-2
2021-04-12Monte Carlo MastersR64clayCasper Ruud6-2 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Rune H.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ruud C.Rune H.
54
Serve
—
69
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Rune H.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
54%
Service points won·Even
66%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
66%
65%
Aces / match·Even
5.7
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Rune H.
Clutch Rating·Even
91
91
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Slight edge
75
84
Deciding sets·Even
99
98
Tiebreaks·Even
97
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruud C.
8.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Rune H.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+244 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Clay Elo 1729
6.9Overall Elo 1983
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1757
10.0
H2H
0.0
10.0
Surface form
7.5
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.8
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
8.5
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Rune H.
Freshness·
98
—

Ruud C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
16°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 40%
Final
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Davidovich Fokina A.
Dimitrov G.
6-46-726-3
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Zverev A.[2]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Davidovich Fokina A.
Fritz T.[10]
2-66-46-3
Dimitrov G.
Hurkacz H.[11]
6-43-67-62
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-26-736-4
Zverev A.[2]
Sinner J.[9]
5-76-37-65
R16
Schwartzman D.[12]
Musetti L.
2-66-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Goffin D.
6-46-1
Fritz T.[10]
Korda S.
7-647-5
Dimitrov G.
Ruud C.[4]
6-37-5
Hurkacz H.[11]
Ramos A.
7-626-2
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Djere L.
7-57-61
Sinner J.[9]
Rublev A.[5]
5-76-16-3
Zverev A.[2]
Carreno Busta P.[13]
6-27-5
R32
Dimitrov G.
Lajovic D.
4-66-36-2
Carreno Busta P.[13]
Bublik A.
4-67-634-3
Fritz T.[10]
Cilic M.
6-34-66-4
Korda S.
Alcaraz C.[8]
7-626-756-3
Ruud C.[4]
Rune H.
7-657-5
Hurkacz H.[11]
Martinez P.
6-34-66-4
Ramos A.
Norrie C.[7]
6-42-66-4
Musetti L.
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
6-27-62
Schwartzman D.[12]
Fucsovics M.
6-07-64
Djere L.
Sonego L.[16]
6-46-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Djokovic N.[1]
6-36-756-1
Goffin D.
Evans D.
7-656-2
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Fognini F.
6-36-0
Rublev A.[5]
De Minaur A.
2-66-16-4
Sinner J.[9]
Ruusuvuori E.
7-56-3
Zverev A.[2]
Delbonis F.
6-17-5
R64
Dimitrov G.
Basilashvili N.[15]
6-32-0
Ruusuvuori E.
Otte O.
6-46-3
Sinner J.[9]
Coric B.
6-32-66-3
Carreno Busta P.[13]
Baez S.
6-44-66-2
Bublik A.
Wawrinka S.
3-67-56-2
Delbonis F.
Munar J.
6-43-66-4
Fucsovics M.
Harris L.
6-46-756-1
Martinez P.
Humbert U.
6-47-65
Davidovich Fokina A.
Giron M.
7-56-3
Goffin D.
Lehecka J.
6-46-3
Evans D.
Bonzi B.
6-07-64
Fritz T.[10]
Catarina L.
6-767-656-4
Cilic M.
Tsonga J.
6-26-2
Korda S.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-56-4
Rune H.
Karatsev A.
7-614-66-3
Lajovic D.
Krajinovic F.
6-27-64
Hurkacz H.[11]
Dellien H.
7-56-4
Ramos A.
Griekspoor T.
6-44-66-2
Musetti L.
Paire B.
6-26-746-2
Schwartzman D.[12]
Khachanov K.
6-756-36-3
Sonego L.[16]
Ivashka I.
6-36-3
Djere L.
Cressy M.
6-46-776-2
Fognini F.
Rinderknech A.
7-54-66-3
De Minaur A.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-4