Renzo Olivo vs Nicolas Jarry — San Luis Potosi CH Semi-final

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Renzo Olivo
ARG8
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
Nicolas Jarry
CHI2
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Olivo R.
6-3 6-2
Jarry N.
Olivo R.
662
Jarry N.
320

Renzo Olivo defeated Nicolas Jarry 6-3 6-2 in the San Luis Potosi CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Olivo R.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Jarry N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Serve advantage — Jarry N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Olivo R.Jarry N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
64%
77%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.8
10.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Olivo R.Jarry N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
48
Break points saved·Dominant
33
98
Break points won·Slight edge
15
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
41
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Olivo R.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jarry N.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
4.6
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bellier A.
Olivo R.[8]
6-726-47-5
Semi-finals
Olivo R.[8]
Jarry N.[2]
6-36-2
Bellier A.
Huesler M.[6]
2-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Bellier A.
Martin A.[1]
6-36-4
Olivo R.[8]
Escobedo E.[3]
6-42-66-4
Huesler M.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-43-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-47-5
R16
Zhang Z.
Mejia N.
7-56-746-3
Olivo R.[8]
Oliveira G.
5-76-36-2
Huesler M.[6]
Shang J.
6-47-66
Bellier A.
Gaio F.[7]
6-31-66-3
Martin A.[1]
Kuhn N.
2-66-46-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Istomin D.
6-44-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-766-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Clarke J.[5]
6-46-0
R32
Clarke J.[5]
Zukas M.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-2
Gaio F.[7]
Krstin P.
6-22-67-5
Jarry N.[2]
Melzer G.
2-66-37-64
Istomin D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-736-16-3
Oliveira G.
Mochizuki S.
6-47-5
Huesler M.[6]
Quiroz R.
7-616-3
Shang J.
Habib H.
4-67-616-2
Zhang Z.
Mena F.[4]
7-636-1
Martin A.[1]
Lenz J.
6-16-1
Soares Klier Junior G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-676-4
Mejia N.
Durasovic V.
7-56-737-63
Bellier A.
Jianu F.
6-33-67-5
Kuhn N.
Ficovich J.
7-625-76-3
Olivo R.[8]
Cazaux A.
6-43-66-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Donskoy E.
7-626-3