John Isner vs Cristian Garin — Houston Semi-final

Houston · ATP · Semi-final
USA4
John Isner
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
Cristian Garin
CHI5
Cristian Garin
#125ATP
1667ELO
1659Clay ELO
$365kYTD
$7.0MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Isner J.
4-6 6-3 6-4
Garin C.
Isner J.
4662
Garin C.
6341

John Isner defeated Cristian Garin 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the Houston semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Cristian Garin came in leading the head-to-head 2–1. John Isner narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-08-09Canada MastersR32hardJohn Isner4-6 6-3 6-4
2019-10-28Paris MastersR32hardCristian Garin7-6(5) 7-6(4)
2019-08-05Canada MastersR32hardCristian Garin6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Isner J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Garin C.

Garin C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Isner J.Garin C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
80%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
72%
62%
Return points won·Clear edge
28%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
21.6
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (63 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Isner J.Garin C.
Clutch Rating·Even
64
63
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
94
Break points won·Dominant
0
45
Deciding sets·Slight edge
91
83
Tiebreaks·Dominant
98
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Isner J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Garin C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.6
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Opelka R.[3]
Isner J.[4]
6-37-67
Semi-finals
Isner J.[4]
Garin C.[5]
4-66-36-4
Opelka R.[3]
Kyrgios N.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Kyrgios N.
Mmoh M.
W/O
Opelka R.[3]
Brouwer G.
6-37-5
Isner J.[4]
Tiafoe F.[6]
6-42-66-3
Garin C.[5]
Fritz T.[2]
6-26-756-3
R16
Tiafoe F.[6]
Cuevas P.
5-77-57-64
Kyrgios N.
Paul T.[7]
6-46-2
Garin C.[5]
Thompson J.
3-66-36-3
Isner J.[4]
Johnson S.
6-717-646-3
Brouwer G.
Wolf J.
6-16-1
Opelka R.[3]
Krueger M.
3-66-26-4
Mmoh M.
Querrey S.
6-26-4
Fritz T.[2]
Tabilo A.
6-16-4
R32
Krueger M.
Varillas J.
5-1
Paul T.[7]
Gojowczyk P.
6-747-653-2
Querrey S.
Galan D.
7-603-67-66
Tabilo A.
Harrison C.
6-16-4
Brouwer G.
Lopez F.
6-46-2
Kyrgios N.
Mcdonald M.
4-66-36-4
Tiafoe F.[6]
Giron M.
6-46-4
Wolf J.
Brooksby J.[8]
6-46-4
Cuevas P.
Purcell M.
7-676-3
Johnson S.
Kudla D.
6-34-66-4
Garin C.[5]
Sock J.
4-66-37-5
Thompson J.
Diez S.
6-36-2