Gilles Simon vs Tomas Machac — Phoenix CH Qualifying Round 2

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
FRA2
Gilles Simon
41 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2022
hard
Tomas Machac
CZE7
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Simon G.
7-5 6-1
Machac T.
Simon G.
762
Machac T.
510

Gilles Simon defeated Tomas Machac 7-5 6-1 in the Phoenix CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Gilles Simon came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Simon G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Simon G.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Simon G.Machac T.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Simon G.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
5.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (53 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Simon G.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
74
90
Break points saved·Even
94
98
Break points won·Clear edge
68
80
Deciding sets·Clear edge
73
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
82
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Simon G.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Machac T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
7.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.4
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Kukushkin M.[6]
Fabbiano T.[11]
6-36-2
Purcell M.[8]
Sandgren T.[5]
6-27-5
Simon G.[2]
Machac T.[7]
7-56-1
Kovacevic A.
King E.
6-47-62
Nava E.
Bolt A.[12]
6-27-64
Krueger M.[9]
Moraing M.[1]
6-36-2
Q1
Machac T.[7]
Shang J.
6-36-0
Moraing M.[1]
Jung J.
6-23-67-5
Sandgren T.[5]
Escobar G.
7-57-65
Bolt A.[12]
Blanch U.
6-46-3
Fabbiano T.[11]
Smith J.
6-16-4
Kukushkin M.[6]
Soeda G.
6-26-0
Purcell M.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-46-4
Nava E.
Grenier H.[4]
6-06-1
Kovacevic A.
Clarke J.[10]
4-67-636-4
King E.
Gerasimov E.[3]
6-47-62
Simon G.[2]
Cassone M.
6-36-1
Krueger M.[9]
Svajda Z.
6-746-36-1