Gilles Simon vs Emilio Nava — Pau CH Round of 32

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA6
Gilles Simon
41 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Simon G.
6-4 7-6
Nava E.
Simon G.
6772
Nava E.
4620

Gilles Simon defeated Emilio Nava 6-4 7-6 in the Pau CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Gilles Simon came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Simon G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Simon G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Simon G.Nava E.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Simon G.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
7.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (53 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Simon G.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
74
52
Break points saved·Even
94
94
Break points won·Dominant
68
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
73
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Simon G.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nava E.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
5.2
4.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Simon G.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Halys Q.[7]
Pospisil V.[8]
4-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[7]
Safiullin R.
7-656-756-4
Pospisil V.[8]
Guinard M.
7-627-64
Quarter-finals
Safiullin R.
Lestienne C.
6-36-4
Guinard M.
Simon G.[6]
6-26-2
Halys Q.[7]
Barrere G.
6-736-26-2
Pospisil V.[8]
Escoffier A.
6-46-2
R16
Lestienne C.
Gulbis E.
6-36-2
Barrere G.
Herbert P.[4]
6-796-37-5
Halys Q.[7]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4
Guinard M.
Kukushkin M.
6-756-46-3
Pospisil V.[8]
Fils A.
6-36-4
Simon G.[6]
Bemelmans R.
7-637-5
Safiullin R.
Pouille L.
W/O
Escoffier A.
Albot R.
7-657-62
R32
Guinard M.
Kuznetsov A.
6-15-3
Safiullin R.
Tsonga J.
6-47-66
Pouille L.
Gombos N.[5]
2-67-657-62
Herbert P.[4]
Stricker D.
4-67-626-4
Serdarusic N.
Kuhn N.
7-636-4
Halys Q.[7]
Muller A.
6-37-63
Simon G.[6]
Nava E.
6-47-62
Bemelmans R.
Benchetrit E.
4-66-46-4
Kukushkin M.
Lehecka J.[3]
6-06-2
Fils A.
Zhang Z.
7-56-0
Albot R.
Janvier M.
6-45-76-0
Barrere G.
Mayot H.
6-36-3
Pospisil V.[8]
Hoang A.
6-36-4
Lestienne C.
Van Assche L.
6-36-2
Escoffier A.
Zuk K.
3-66-36-4
Gulbis E.
Peniston R.
3-66-16-3