Albert Ramos vs Facundo Bagnis — Santiago Quarter-final

Santiago · ATP · Quarter-final
ESP2
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
clay
ARG8
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Ramos A.
7-5 6-2
Bagnis F.
Ramos A.
762
Bagnis F.
520

Albert Ramos defeated Facundo Bagnis 7-5 6-2 in the Santiago quarter-final on clay. Albert Ramos extended the head-to-head to 4–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Albert Ramos closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

3–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-22CordobaSFclayAlbert Ramos7-5 5-7 6-3
2020-02-03CordobaR32clayAlbert Ramos6-4 7-6(3)
2019-02-25Sao PauloR32clayAlbert Ramos6-1 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.1
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
54
Break points saved·Even
95
92
Break points won·Clear edge
49
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
80
89
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Bagnis F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3Clay Elo 1526
Surface ELO
5.7+58 Clay Elo edge
4.6Overall Elo 1558
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1591
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
3.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
8.2
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
23°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 36%
Final
Martinez P.[4]
Baez S.[7]
4-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Martinez P.[4]
Tabilo A.
5-76-46-4
Baez S.[7]
Ramos A.[2]
6-44-66-2
Quarter-finals
Baez S.[7]
Monteiro T.
7-53-66-4
Tabilo A.
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-16-4
Martinez P.[4]
Hanfmann Y.
6-26-2
Ramos A.[2]
Bagnis F.[8]
7-56-2
R16
Tabilo A.
Garin C.[1]
6-36-3
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-0
Martinez P.[4]
Munar J.
6-45-77-5
Hanfmann Y.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-16-3
Baez S.[7]
Londero J.
6-36-3
Monteiro T.
Delbonis F.[3]
3-66-46-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Dellien H.
6-26-2
Ramos A.[2]
Taberner C.
6-27-64
R32
Bagnis F.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-0
Seyboth Wild T.
Kicker N.
6-43-66-4
Tabilo A.
Olivo R.
6-16-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Rune H.
6-46-4
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Cecchinato M.
7-56-1
Munar J.
Galan D.
6-16-3
Hanfmann Y.
Coria F.[5]
3-66-26-4
Baez S.[7]
Varillas J.
6-46-4
Londero J.
Etcheverry T.
4-66-47-5
Monteiro T.
Jarry N.
7-696-4
Dellien H.
Lama G.
6-36-4
Taberner C.
Cerundolo J.
6-27-5