Albert Ramos vs Facundo Bagnis — Cordoba Round of 32

Cordoba · ATP · Round of 32
ESP5
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2020
clay
ARG
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Ramos A.
6-4 7-6
Bagnis F.
Ramos A.
6772
Bagnis F.
4630

Albert Ramos defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-4 7-6 in the Cordoba round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 3–0, defending last year's round of 16. Albert Ramos extended the head-to-head to 4–0.

Key context

Head to head

3–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-02-21SantiagoQFclayAlbert Ramos7-5 6-2
2021-02-22CordobaSFclayAlbert Ramos7-5 5-7 6-3
2019-02-25Sao PauloR32clayAlbert Ramos6-1 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.1
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
54
Break points saved·Even
95
92
Break points won·Clear edge
49
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
80
89
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Garin C.[3]
Schwartzman D.[1]
2-66-46-0
Semi-finals
Garin C.[3]
Martin A.
2-66-26-2
Schwartzman D.[1]
Djere L.[4]
6-11-66-2
Quarter-finals
Djere L.[4]
Londero J.[8]
6-756-37-65
Garin C.[3]
Cuevas P.[6]
1-66-36-4
Schwartzman D.[1]
Ramos A.[5]
6-07-60
Martin A.
Moutet C.
6-36-2
R16
Schwartzman D.[1]
Munar J.
6-17-5
Ramos A.[5]
Andujar P.
6-36-746-4
Londero J.[8]
Cachin P.
6-36-3
Cuevas P.[6]
Mager G.
6-757-626-1
Martin A.
Taberner C.
6-37-67
Moutet C.
Pella G.[2]
6-747-56-3
Djere L.[4]
Martinez P.
6-36-4
Garin C.[3]
Balazs A.
6-36-0
R32
Londero J.[8]
Cecchinato M.
6-27-5
Munar J.
Mayer L.
6-46-3
Ramos A.[5]
Bagnis F.
6-47-63
Martinez P.
Gaio F.
4-66-36-4
Cachin P.
Dellien H.
6-16-1
Cuevas P.[6]
Delbonis F.
7-56-2
Mager G.
Ficovich J.
6-23-66-2
Balazs A.
Sonego L.
6-27-63
Taberner C.
Verdasco F.[7]
4-66-16-4
Martin A.
Coria F.
7-656-4
Moutet C.
Monteiro T.
6-46-3
Andujar P.
Horansky F.
6-26-2