Jack Draper vs Quentin Halys — Forli 4 CH Round of 16

Forli 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 February 2022
hard
Quentin Halys
FRA1
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Draper J.
7-6 6-4
Halys Q.
Draper J.
7762
Halys Q.
6440

Jack Draper defeated Quentin Halys 7-6 6-4 in the Forli 4 CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jack Draper came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Jack Draper extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-23DubaiR32hardJack Draper7-6(8) 6-3
2022-08-08Canada MastersQ2hardJack Draper3-1 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Draper J.Halys Q.
—
Serve
35
—
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Even
66%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
11.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
57
Break points saved·Even
99
97
Break points won·Dominant
83
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
96
75
Tiebreaks·Even
95
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Halys Q.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.6+106 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Hard Elo 1677
7.8Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1707
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
6.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Halys Q.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
93

Draper J.: 18 days rest · Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Van Rijthoven T.
Borges N.[4]
6-46-2
Draper J.
Watanuki Y.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Watanuki Y.
Barrere G.[3]
7-56-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Haase R.
6-46-3
Borges N.[4]
Lestienne C.
6-36-3
Draper J.
Furness E.
6-26-3
R16
Haase R.
Nava E.
7-56-2
Borges N.[4]
Pellegrino A.
6-16-4
Lestienne C.
Napolitano S.
7-54-66-4
Watanuki Y.
Marterer M.
5-76-26-3
Draper J.
Halys Q.[1]
7-646-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Schnur B.
7-657-5
Barrere G.[3]
Hassan B.
6-13-0
Furness E.
Torpegaard M.
6-14-3
R32
Furness E.
Hoang A.
7-657-64
Haase R.
Moriya H.
7-626-3
Nava E.
Piros Z.
4-66-46-0
Schnur B.
Gigante M.
6-43-66-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-27-61
Borges N.[4]
Giustino L.
7-646-3
Marterer M.
Serdarusic N.
6-756-47-62
Barrere G.[3]
Zeppieri G.
6-36-4
Torpegaard M.
Moroni G.[5]
7-642-67-66
Lestienne C.
Arnaldi M.
6-25-76-2
Napolitano S.
Elias G.[8]
6-16-4
Watanuki Y.
De Jong J.[7]
6-26-4
Pellegrino A.
Domingues J.
6-16-3
Halys Q.[1]
Sachko V.
6-17-63
Draper J.
Basic M.
6-26-2
Hassan B.
Bemelmans R.
6-46-4