Jack Draper vs Quentin Halys — Dubai Round of 32

Dubai · ATP · Round of 32
Jack Draper
GBR4
Jack Draper
#131ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 February 2026
hard
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#95ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Draper J.
7-6 6-3
Halys Q.
Draper J.
71062
Halys Q.
6830

Jack Draper defeated Quentin Halys 7-6 6-3 in the Dubai round of 32 on hard. Jack Draper extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Jack Draper closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-08Canada MastersQ2hardJack Draper3-1 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Draper J.Halys Q.
—
Serve
35
—
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
67%
Return points won·Even
32%
35%
Break points saved·Clear edge
53%
67%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.1
9.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (7 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
57
Break points saved·Even
99
97
Break points won·Dominant
83
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
96
75
Tiebreaks·Even
95
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Halys Q.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.6+106 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Hard Elo 1677
7.8Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1707
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
3.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Halys Q.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
89

Draper J.: 15 days rest · Halys Q.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
26°CClear
Wind 6 km/hHumidity 53%
Final
Medvedev D.[3]
Griekspoor T.
W/O
Semi-finals
Medvedev D.[3]
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
6-46-2
Griekspoor T.
Rublev A.[5]
7-57-66
Quarter-finals
Medvedev D.[3]
Brooksby J.
6-26-1
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Lehecka J.[8]
6-37-62
Griekspoor T.
Mensik J.[6]
6-33-66-2
Rublev A.[5]
Rinderknech A.
6-26-4
R16
Lehecka J.[8]
Carreno Busta P.
7-666-4
Griekspoor T.
Bublik A.[2]
6-37-64
Rinderknech A.
Draper J.[4]
7-56-746-4
Medvedev D.[3]
Wawrinka S.
6-26-3
Mensik J.[6]
Popyrin A.
6-36-2
Brooksby J.
Khachanov K.[7]
7-666-4
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-46-4
Rublev A.[5]
Humbert U.
6-46-756-3
R32
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Echargui M.
7-636-737-64
Carreno Busta P.
Shapovalov D.
6-26-4
Bublik A.[2]
Struff J.
6-36-4
Rinderknech A.
Marozsan F.
3-66-36-4
Mensik J.[6]
Hurkacz H.
6-47-67
Wawrinka S.
Hassan B.
7-56-3
Brooksby J.
Bergs Z.
6-36-4
Khachanov K.[7]
Shevchenko A.
6-756-26-3
Griekspoor T.
Virtanen O.
6-36-4
Lehecka J.[8]
Nardi L.
4-66-46-2
Medvedev D.[3]
Shang J.
6-16-3
Humbert U.
Tsitsipas S.
6-47-5
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Zhang Z.
6-37-64
Rublev A.[5]
Royer V.
6-36-4
Draper J.[4]
Halys Q.
7-686-3
Popyrin A.
Majchrzak K.
3-66-37-5