John Isner vs Vasek Pospisil — Dallas Quarter-final

Dallas · ATP · Quarter-final
USA3
John Isner
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 February 2022
hard
CAN
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Isner J.
6-4 6-4
Pospisil V.
Isner J.
662
Pospisil V.
440

John Isner defeated Vasek Pospisil 6-4 6-4 in the Dallas quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — John Isner came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. John Isner extended the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

  • Match story: John Isner edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

4–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-07-24AtlantaR16hardJohn Isner6-3 6-4
2015-08-10Canada MastersR32hardJohn Isner7-6(1) 4-6 6-3
2015-08-03WashingtonR16hardJohn Isner6-4 7-6(6)
2013-08-05Canada MastersR64hardVasek Pospisil5-7 7-6(5) 7-6(4)
2013-02-11San JoseR16hardJohn Isner7-6(3) 2-6 6-3
2011-10-31ValenciaR32hardVasek Pospisil6-3 3-6 7-6(9)

Serve vs return

This season
Isner J.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Pospisil V.serving96% hold

wins 76% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Isner J.Pospisil V.
1st serve in·Clear edge
68%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
80%
78%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
28%
36%
Break points saved·Even
69%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
21.6
9.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (63 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Isner J.Pospisil V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
64
49
Break points saved·Even
99
96
Break points won·Slight edge
0
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
98
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Isner J.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pospisil V.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
1.7
Surface form
9.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
9.07-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.0
3-set count
4.0
0.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Opelka R.[2]
Brooksby J.[4]
7-657-63
Semi-finals
Opelka R.[2]
Isner J.[3]
7-677-622
Brooksby J.[4]
Giron M.[7]
6-46-747-65
Quarter-finals
Brooksby J.[4]
Thompson J.
6-36-0
Opelka R.[2]
Mannarino A.[5]
6-36-4
Giron M.[7]
Fritz T.[1]
6-43-67-63
Isner J.[3]
Pospisil V.
6-46-4
R16
Isner J.[3]
Anderson K.
7-616-777-65
Fritz T.[1]
Sock J.
6-16-4
Opelka R.[2]
Stebe C.
7-637-68
Pospisil V.
Rodionov J.
6-737-666-2
Giron M.[7]
Broady L.
3-66-36-1
Brooksby J.[4]
Seppi A.
6-33-66-3
Thompson J.
Nakashima B.[8]
7-57-61
Mannarino A.[5]
Nishioka Y.
6-36-1
R32
Nishioka Y.
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Anderson K.
Querrey S.
6-46-4
Broady L.
Gojowczyk P.
6-16-4
Sock J.
Otte O.
6-46-4
Stebe C.
Kudla D.
7-673-66-3
Pospisil V.
Chakravarthi C.
6-16-0
Mannarino A.[5]
Johnson S.
6-726-27-62
Nakashima B.[8]
Millman J.
7-57-63
Giron M.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-46-4
Seppi A.
Altmaier D.
4-66-36-4
Thompson J.
Lopez F.
7-56-3
Rodionov J.
Cressy M.[6]
7-634-66-1