Enzo Couacaud vs Jiri Vesely — Bengaluru 1 CH Quarter-final

Bengaluru 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
FRA6
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 7 February 2022
hard
CZE1
Jiri Vesely
#2142ATP
33 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWWLL
Couacaud E.
6-4 0-0
Vesely J.
Couacaud E.
60–
Vesely J.
40–

Enzo Couacaud advanced when Jiri Vesely retired 6-4 0-0 in the Bengaluru 1 CH quarter-final. Enzo Couacaud claimed a first win over Jiri Vesely in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-08-28US OpenR128hardJiri Vesely5-7 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Couacaud E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Vesely J.

Vesely J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Couacaud E.Vesely J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.6
10.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 121). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Couacaud E.Vesely J.
Clutch Rating·Even
47
46
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
95
Break points won·Clear edge
29
8
Deciding sets·Even
77
75
Tiebreaks·Even
29
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Couacaud E.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vesely J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
8.3
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Couacaud E.[6]
7-56-4
Gojo B.
Muller A.
4-66-36-0
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[6]
Vesely J.[1]
6-40-0
Muller A.
Ilkel C.
6-47-67
Tseng C.
Decamps G.
6-46-4
Gojo B.
Coppejans K.
7-56-4
R16
Couacaud E.[6]
Purcell M.
6-43-66-2
Muller A.
Kuzmanov D.
7-646-4
Decamps G.
Moroni G.
6-25-77-63
Tseng C.
Grenier H.[4]
6-16-4
Vesely J.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
3-66-26-1
Coppejans K.
Celikbilek A.[5]
7-6126-3
Ilkel C.
Donskoy E.
2-66-37-5
Gojo B.
Vukic A.[3]
7-56-3
R32
Decamps G.
Gaio F.[8]
6-36-3
Gunneswaran P.
Bourgue M.
7-646-2
Kuzmanov D.
Dev S.
6-26-2
Donskoy E.
Jaziri M.
7-6106-4
Gojo B.
Noguchi R.
3-66-16-2
Celikbilek A.[5]
Kadhe A.
6-16-2
Moroni G.
Myneni S.
6-16-1
Tseng C.
Clarke J.
6-36-1
Grenier H.[4]
Kopriva V.
6-12-66-4
Vesely J.[1]
Bellier A.
6-36-726-2
Vukic A.[3]
Kubler J.
7-56-4
Purcell M.
Ramanathan R.
3-66-07-5
Muller A.
Travaglia S.[2]
6-17-62
Couacaud E.[6]
Reddy R.
6-16-3
Coppejans K.
Polmans M.
1-66-26-4
Ilkel C.
Diez S.
6-26-3