Tommy Paul vs Taro Daniel — Adelaide 1 Round of 16

Adelaide 1 · ATP · Round of 16
Tommy Paul
USA6
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 January 2022
hard
Taro Daniel
JPN
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
Paul T.
6-4 6-7 6-4
Daniel T.
Paul T.
66162
Daniel T.
47741

Tommy Paul defeated Taro Daniel 6-4 6-7 6-4 in the Adelaide 1 round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tommy Paul came in ranked #24, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Tommy Paul extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Tommy Paul edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–7 6–4.

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-05DallasR16hardTommy Paul6-3 6-2
2023-06-19Queen's ClubQ1grassTommy Paul6-3 6-4
2017-08-28US OpenR128hardTaro Daniel6-1 4-6 4-6 6-2 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paul T.Daniel T.
71
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
93
Break points won·Dominant
87
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
16
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
96
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paul T.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Daniel T.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
9.9+369 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.1Hard Elo 1512
10.0Overall Elo 1949
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1567
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.6
Surface form
4.5
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Daniel T.
Freshness·Clear edge
88
69

Paul T.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Monfils G.[1]
Khachanov K.[2]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Monfils G.[1]
Kokkinakis T.
7-56-0
Khachanov K.[2]
Cilic M.[3]
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Monfils G.[1]
Paul T.[6]
6-46-1
Cilic M.[3]
Djere L.[7]
6-36-2
Khachanov K.[2]
Gerasimov E.
7-56-3
Kokkinakis T.
Ymer M.
7-694-66-4
R16
Ymer M.
Kwon S.[8]
6-36-2
Cilic M.[3]
Monteiro T.
6-47-63
Paul T.[6]
Daniel T.
6-46-716-4
Gerasimov E.
Mager G.
6-13-66-3
Kokkinakis T.
Tiafoe F.[4]
3-67-56-1
Khachanov K.[2]
Johnson S.
6-44-66-2
Monfils G.[1]
Cerundolo J.
6-26-1
Djere L.[7]
Moutet C.
4-67-50-0
R32
Moutet C.
Rune H.
7-666-4
Cerundolo J.
Bolt A.
6-26-4
Kwon S.[8]
Nishioka Y.
6-16-2
Gerasimov E.
Fucsovics M.[5]
6-36-4
Ymer M.
Bonzi B.
7-57-5
Paul T.[6]
Vesely J.
6-44-66-4
Daniel T.
Musetti L.
6-46-756-3
Johnson S.
Vukic A.
6-42-66-4
Kokkinakis T.
Millman J.
6-46-3
Djere L.[7]
Carballes Baena R.
7-57-61
Monteiro T.
Altmaier D.
6-23-67-62
Mager G.
Cerundolo F.
6-43-66-4