Chun Hsin Tseng vs Andrej Martin — Maia 2 CH Semi-final

Maia 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE7
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 December 2021
clay
SVK1
Andrej Martin
#392ATP
1470ELO
1444Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWWL
Tseng C.
6-1 6-2
Martin A.
Tseng C.
662
Martin A.
120

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Andrej Martin 6-1 6-2 in the Maia 2 CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Martin A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Martin A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 166). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Martin A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
12
Break points saved·Dominant
83
54
Break points won·Slight edge
15
25
Deciding sets·Slight edge
31
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Martin A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+97 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Clay Elo 1444
5.7Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1470
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.4
Surface form
6.4
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
6.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.[7]
Borges N.[5]
5-77-56-2
Semi-finals
Borges N.[5]
Benchetrit E.
6-26-2
Tseng C.[7]
Martin A.[1]
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Martin A.[1]
Fanselow S.
6-26-2
Benchetrit E.
Ejupovic E.
5-76-16-4
Borges N.[5]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-46-4
Tseng C.[7]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-17-5
R16
Ejupovic E.
Coppejans K.[2]
6-46-4
Benchetrit E.
Hardt N.
6-36-4
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Elias G.[4]
6-16-756-3
Esteve Lobato E.
Jianu F.
5-76-36-4
Fanselow S.
Oliveira G.[8]
7-636-4
Tseng C.[7]
Marozsan F.
7-646-3
Borges N.[5]
Lavagno E.
6-36-2
Martin A.[1]
Potenza L.
W/O
R32
Coppejans K.[2]
Araujo P.
6-44-66-3
Benchetrit E.
Gautier A.
6-26-2
Hardt N.
Domingues J.[6]
6-35-76-3
Elias G.[4]
Krutykh O.
4-66-27-5
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-44-66-4
Lavagno E.
Cacao T.
6-12-67-66
Borges N.[5]
Bonadio R.
7-686-2
Tseng C.[7]
Viola M.
6-36-4
Esteve Lobato E.
Prihodko O.
6-36-2
Jianu F.
Janvier M.[3]
7-656-2
Oliveira G.[8]
Melzer G.
4-66-47-63
Potenza L.
Wessels L.
6-42-67-65
Ejupovic E.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-4
Martin A.[1]
Wenger D.
7-616-757-5
Marozsan F.
Erler A.
6-16-2
Fanselow S.
Coelho F.
6-33-66-3