Chun Hsin Tseng vs Matteo Viola — Maia 2 CH Round of 32

Maia 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE7
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 December 2021
clay
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
Tseng C.
6-3 6-4
Viola M.
Tseng C.
662
Viola M.
340

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Matteo Viola 6-3 6-4 in the Maia 2 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Viola M.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Viola M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Viola M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
8
Break points saved·Dominant
83
20
Break points won·Slight edge
15
25
Deciding sets·Clear edge
31
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Viola M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
1.5
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
5.9
4.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.[7]
Borges N.[5]
5-77-56-2
Semi-finals
Borges N.[5]
Benchetrit E.
6-26-2
Tseng C.[7]
Martin A.[1]
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Martin A.[1]
Fanselow S.
6-26-2
Benchetrit E.
Ejupovic E.
5-76-16-4
Borges N.[5]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-46-4
Tseng C.[7]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-17-5
R16
Ejupovic E.
Coppejans K.[2]
6-46-4
Benchetrit E.
Hardt N.
6-36-4
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Elias G.[4]
6-16-756-3
Esteve Lobato E.
Jianu F.
5-76-36-4
Fanselow S.
Oliveira G.[8]
7-636-4
Tseng C.[7]
Marozsan F.
7-646-3
Borges N.[5]
Lavagno E.
6-36-2
Martin A.[1]
Potenza L.
W/O
R32
Coppejans K.[2]
Araujo P.
6-44-66-3
Benchetrit E.
Gautier A.
6-26-2
Hardt N.
Domingues J.[6]
6-35-76-3
Elias G.[4]
Krutykh O.
4-66-27-5
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-44-66-4
Lavagno E.
Cacao T.
6-12-67-66
Borges N.[5]
Bonadio R.
7-686-2
Tseng C.[7]
Viola M.
6-36-4
Esteve Lobato E.
Prihodko O.
6-36-2
Jianu F.
Janvier M.[3]
7-656-2
Oliveira G.[8]
Melzer G.
4-66-47-63
Potenza L.
Wessels L.
6-42-67-65
Ejupovic E.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-4
Martin A.[1]
Wenger D.
7-616-757-5
Marozsan F.
Erler A.
6-16-2
Fanselow S.
Coelho F.
6-33-66-3