Evgeny Karlovskiy vs Mirza Basic — Manama CH Round of 32

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
RUS
Evgeny Karlovskiy
#1219ATP
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 November 2021
hard
Mirza Basic
BIH8
Mirza Basic
#602ATP
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Karlovskiy E.
6-2 6-3
Basic M.
Karlovskiy E.
662
Basic M.
230

Evgeny Karlovskiy defeated Mirza Basic 6-2 6-3 in the Manama CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Karlovskiy E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Basic M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Karlovskiy E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Karlovskiy E.Basic M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 164). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Karlovskiy E.Basic M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
33
Break points saved·Even
55
56
Break points won·Even
5
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
7
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
12
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Karlovskiy E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Basic M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.6
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Ramanathan R.[6]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Ramanathan R.[6]
Clarke J.[7]
5-76-36-2
Karlovskiy E.
Erel Y.
3-67-666-3
Quarter-finals
Clarke J.[7]
Lazarov A.
6-21-0
Karlovskiy E.
Borges N.
7-656-3
Erel Y.
Peniston R.
2-66-37-5
Ramanathan R.[6]
Oliveira G.
6-34-67-5
R16
Borges N.
Ilkel C.[2]
6-36-1
Peniston R.
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-4
Clarke J.[7]
Viola M.
6-26-1
Ramanathan R.[6]
Ajdukovic D.
6-26-4
Karlovskiy E.
Haerteis J.
6-36-1
Erel Y.
Moriya H.
6-35-76-2
Lazarov A.
Fatic N.
6-37-63
Oliveira G.
Escoffier A.
7-653-66-4
R32
Fatic N.
Miedler L.
6-36-3
Borges N.
Jianu F.
6-37-66
Ilkel C.[2]
Kirkin E.
6-46-2
Haerteis J.
Erler A.
6-36-4
Peniston R.
Oconnell C.[4]
6-756-37-64
Blancaneaux G.
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-36-2
Erel Y.
Gunneswaran P.[5]
6-36-3
Ajdukovic D.
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Escoffier A.
Neuchrist M.
6-36-4
Oliveira G.
Gengel M.
6-46-4
Ramanathan R.[6]
Orlov V.
6-26-4
Lazarov A.
Celikbilek A.[3]
6-26-3
Karlovskiy E.
Basic M.[8]
6-26-3
Viola M.
Hsu Y.
6-47-5
Moriya H.
Virtanen O.
6-36-2
Clarke J.[7]
Abdulnabi H.
6-06-0