Nuno Borges vs Cem Ilkel — Manama CH Round of 16

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Nuno Borges
POR
Nuno Borges
#52ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 November 2021
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR2
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Borges N.
6-3 6-1
Ilkel C.
Borges N.
662
Ilkel C.
310

Nuno Borges defeated Cem Ilkel 6-3 6-1 in the Manama CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Nuno Borges came in ranked #52.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Borges N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Borges N.Ilkel C.
36
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Borges N.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.6
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Borges N.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
32
Break points saved·Dominant
98
49
Break points won·Dominant
54
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
70
Tiebreaks·Even
70
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Borges N.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ilkel C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
5.8
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Borges N.Ilkel C.
Freshness·
96
—

Borges N.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Ramanathan R.[6]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Ramanathan R.[6]
Clarke J.[7]
5-76-36-2
Karlovskiy E.
Erel Y.
3-67-666-3
Quarter-finals
Clarke J.[7]
Lazarov A.
6-21-0
Karlovskiy E.
Borges N.
7-656-3
Erel Y.
Peniston R.
2-66-37-5
Ramanathan R.[6]
Oliveira G.
6-34-67-5
R16
Borges N.
Ilkel C.[2]
6-36-1
Peniston R.
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-4
Clarke J.[7]
Viola M.
6-26-1
Ramanathan R.[6]
Ajdukovic D.
6-26-4
Karlovskiy E.
Haerteis J.
6-36-1
Erel Y.
Moriya H.
6-35-76-2
Lazarov A.
Fatic N.
6-37-63
Oliveira G.
Escoffier A.
7-653-66-4
R32
Fatic N.
Miedler L.
6-36-3
Borges N.
Jianu F.
6-37-66
Ilkel C.[2]
Kirkin E.
6-46-2
Haerteis J.
Erler A.
6-36-4
Peniston R.
Oconnell C.[4]
6-756-37-64
Blancaneaux G.
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-36-2
Erel Y.
Gunneswaran P.[5]
6-36-3
Ajdukovic D.
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Escoffier A.
Neuchrist M.
6-36-4
Oliveira G.
Gengel M.
6-46-4
Ramanathan R.[6]
Orlov V.
6-26-4
Lazarov A.
Celikbilek A.[3]
6-26-3
Karlovskiy E.
Basic M.[8]
6-26-3
Viola M.
Hsu Y.
6-47-5
Moriya H.
Virtanen O.
6-36-2
Clarke J.[7]
Abdulnabi H.
6-06-0