Enzo Couacaud vs Nicolas Jarry — Bogota CH Round of 32

Bogota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 October 2021
clay
Nicolas Jarry
CHI4
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Couacaud E.
3-6 7-5 7-6
Jarry N.
Couacaud E.
37772
Jarry N.
65651

Enzo Couacaud defeated Nicolas Jarry 3-6 7-5 7-6 in the Bogota CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Couacaud E.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Jarry N.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Couacaud E.Jarry N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.6
9.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Couacaud E.Jarry N.
Clutch Rating·Even
47
48
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
98
Break points won·Dominant
29
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Couacaud E.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jarry N.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
6.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
5.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Melzer G.
Mena F.[5]
6-23-67-65
Semi-finals
Mena F.[5]
De Jong J.[6]
7-637-5
Melzer G.
Barrientos N.
6-26-756-1
Quarter-finals
Mena F.[5]
Galarneau A.
6-16-4
De Jong J.[6]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-27-5
Barrientos N.
Roca Batalla O.
6-37-5
Melzer G.
Mejia N.
6-06-4
R16
Galarneau A.
Altmaier D.[2]
6-33-66-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Gonzalez A.
6-736-16-2
Roca Batalla O.
Oliveira G.
6-34-67-5
Barrientos N.
Couacaud E.
6-36-4
Melzer G.
Galan D.[1]
7-656-2
Mena F.[5]
Gomez Gb42 A.
6-36-1
Mejia N.
Catarina L.
6-47-5
De Jong J.[6]
Quiroz R.
7-657-66
R32
Altmaier D.[2]
Svrcina D.
6-46-1
Gomez Gb42 A.
Pospisil J.
6-33-67-5
Mena F.[5]
Castelnuovo L.
6-46-2
Gonzalez A.
Kopriva V.[3]
6-27-65
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Gautier A.
6-26-1
Quiroz R.
Zukas M.
6-47-64
Roca Batalla O.
Blanch U.[7]
6-36-2
Oliveira G.
Krstin P.
3-66-36-2
Barrientos N.
Gomez J.
2-66-26-4
Couacaud E.
Jarry N.[4]
3-67-57-65
Catarina L.
Jaziri M.[8]
6-26-3
Mejia N.
Rodriguez C.
6-17-5
Melzer G.
Luz O.
7-56-2
Galan D.[1]
Perchicot M.
4-66-36-4
Galarneau A.
Pena E.
6-16-1
De Jong J.[6]
Martin Tiffon P.
7-637-63