Holger Rune vs Gilles Simon — Orleans CH Round of 32

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Holger Rune
DEN
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1725Hard ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 September 2021
hard
FRA7
Gilles Simon
41 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLLWL
Rune H.
6-4 6-0
Simon G.
Rune H.
662
Simon G.
400

Holger Rune defeated Gilles Simon 6-4 6-0 in the Orleans CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Simon G.

Simon G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Serve advantage — Rune H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rune H.Simon G.
47
Serve
—
58
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Simon G.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Simon G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
91
74
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
94
Break points won·Clear edge
84
68
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
73
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Simon G.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.5
Surface form
2.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
0.4
Minutes 14d
7.5
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Laaksonen H.
Novak D.
6-12-66-2
Semi-finals
Laaksonen H.
Vesely J.[5]
6-36-3
Novak D.
Moutet C.[6]
6-727-666-4
Quarter-finals
Laaksonen H.
Rune H.
6-36-4
Vesely J.[5]
Gasquet R.[4]
6-766-46-2
Moutet C.[6]
Grenier H.
6-47-65
Novak D.
Bemelmans R.
7-667-66
R16
Laaksonen H.
Bonzi B.[2]
7-666-4
Rune H.
Berankis R.
6-26-4
Gasquet R.[4]
Pouille L.
3-67-656-3
Vesely J.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-36-1
Grenier H.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-46-2
Novak D.
Halys Q.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[6]
Safiullin R.
6-42-67-67
Bemelmans R.
Herbert P.[8]
3-67-56-4
R32
Bonzi B.[2]
Mayot H.
6-16-3
Laaksonen H.
Bergs Z.
6-36-1
Berankis R.
Schnur B.
6-706-46-2
Rune H.
Simon G.[7]
6-46-0
Gasquet R.[4]
Viola M.
6-746-16-0
Pouille L.
Ymer E.
6-33-66-1
Tabilo A.
Marcora R.
6-16-3
Safiullin R.
Gulbis E.
6-36-2
Grenier H.
Verdasco F.
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Hoang A.
3-66-46-3
Herbert P.[8]
Masur D.
6-756-36-2
Bemelmans R.
Sousa J.
6-44-66-4
Novak D.
Barrere G.
7-57-5
Moutet C.[6]
Jacquet K.
7-616-1
Halys Q.
Humbert U.[1]
7-6126-4
Vesely J.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
6-757-607-63