Teymuraz Gabashvili vs Gilles Simon — Rennes CH Round of 32

Rennes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
RUS
Teymuraz Gabashvili
41 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
FRA4
Gilles Simon
41 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLLWL
Gabashvili T.
6-3 6-2
Simon G.
Gabashvili T.
662
Simon G.
320

Teymuraz Gabashvili defeated Gilles Simon 6-3 6-2 in the Rennes CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Gilles Simon came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Teymuraz Gabashvili narrowed the head-to-head to 4–3.

Key context

Head to head

2–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-02-15MarseilleR32hardTeymuraz Gabashvili3-6 6-3 7-6(7)
2014-04-13Monte Carlo MastersR64clayTeymuraz Gabashvili4-6 6-4 6-4
2009-02-23DubaiR16hardGilles Simon6-1 6-2
2008-02-18RotterdamQFhardGilles Simon6-3 6-2
2007-04-09ValenciaR32hardGilles Simon4-6 6-3 6-2
2006-04-17Monte Carlo MastersR64clayGilles Simon6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Gabashvili T.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Simon G.

Simon G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gabashvili T.

Serve advantage — Simon G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gabashvili T.Simon G.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
51%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.3
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.0
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (43 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gabashvili T.Simon G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
11
74
Break points saved·Dominant
56
94
Break points won·Dominant
11
68
Deciding sets·Dominant
23
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gabashvili T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Simon G.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
4.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[3]
Moraing M.
7-637-63
Semi-finals
Bonzi B.[3]
Rinderknech A.[2]
6-797-646-1
Moraing M.
Gasquet R.[1]
6-45-76-2
Quarter-finals
Rinderknech A.[2]
Pouille L.[6]
6-37-63
Bonzi B.[3]
Broady L.
6-46-2
Moraing M.
Gabashvili T.
6-27-63
Gasquet R.[1]
Safiullin R.
7-667-5
R16
Rinderknech A.[2]
Lamasine T.
7-686-2
Pouille L.[6]
Hoang A.
3-66-36-4
Bonzi B.[3]
Zuk K.
7-636-3
Broady L.
Barrere G.[7]
7-674-66-4
Moraing M.
Machac T.[8]
7-696-1
Safiullin R.
Murray A.[5]
6-24-66-1
Gasquet R.[1]
Chidekh C.
6-16-4
Gabashvili T.
Escobedo E.
4-66-26-3
R32
Broady L.
Bega A.
6-26-1
Rinderknech A.[2]
Kamke T.
6-33-66-3
Lamasine T.
Soeda G.
7-646-4
Hoang A.
Added D.
6-36-4
Pouille L.[6]
Janvier M.
5-76-46-3
Bonzi B.[3]
Ymer E.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-3
Barrere G.[7]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-677-5
Machac T.[8]
Hemery C.
6-16-1
Moraing M.
Mayot H.
4-67-56-2
Escobedo E.
Lestienne C.
7-56-1
Murray A.[5]
Maden Y.
6-36-1
Chidekh C.
Schnur B.
6-46-4
Gasquet R.[1]
Jacquet K.
7-646-3
Gabashvili T.
Simon G.[4]
6-36-2
Safiullin R.
Guinard M.
6-46-3