Lukas Lacko vs Tobias Kamke — Manacor CH Semi-final

Manacor CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
SVK
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 August 2021
hard
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Lacko L.
6-0 6-3
Kamke T.
Lacko L.
662
Kamke T.
030

Lukas Lacko defeated Tobias Kamke 6-0 6-3 in the Manacor CH semi-final on hard. Lukas Lacko extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-08-26US OpenQ3hardTobias Kamke7-5 6-3
2016-06-27WimbledonQ3grassLukas Lacko6-2 6-7(9) 6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Lacko L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Kamke T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lacko L.Kamke T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (60 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lacko L.Kamke T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
69
Break points won·Clear edge
8
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
33
17
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
27
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lacko L.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Kamke T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
2.2
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lacko L.
Uchiyama Y.[1]
5-77-686-1
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Geerts M.
4-66-17-5
Lacko L.
Kamke T.
6-06-3
Quarter-finals
Kamke T.
Verdasco F.[2]
6-36-1
Lacko L.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-57-5
Geerts M.
Sousa J.[4]
2-66-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Ramanathan R.
4-66-47-65
R16
Verdasco F.[2]
Kozlov S.
1-67-666-2
Kamke T.
Chappell N.
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Viola M.
3-67-56-0
Lacko L.
Kuzmanov D.
6-27-69
Geerts M.
Barrios Vera T.[6]
4-66-26-1
Sousa J.[4]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-36-3
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Zielinski J.
6-16-2
Ramanathan R.
Ofner S.[5]
7-50-0
R32
Verdasco F.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-36-2
Kuzmanov D.
Zuk K.[7]
6-36-4
Ortega Olmedo R.
Mejia N.
7-57-5
Sousa J.[4]
Moriya H.
6-41-67-5
Ofner S.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-756-36-2
Ramanathan R.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-716-47-5
Zielinski J.
Gonzalez A.
6-757-616-4
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-47-63
Lacko L.
Haerteis J.
6-26-3
Geerts M.
Ito T.
4-66-26-1
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Diez S.
4-63-3
Kozlov S.
Rincon D.
6-31-66-1
Chappell N.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-1
Kamke T.
Rola B.[8]
6-46-4
Viola M.
Broady L.[3]
6-43-66-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Tomic B.
6-36-1