Tobias Kamke vs Lukas LackoUS Open Qualifying Final

US Open · ATP · Qualifying Final
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2019
hard
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Kamke T.
7-5 6-3
Lacko L.
Kamke T.
762
Lacko L.
530

Tobias Kamke defeated Lukas Lacko 7-5 6-3 in the US Open qualifying final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Lacko came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 128. Tobias Kamke claimed a first win over Lukas Lacko in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Tobias Kamke closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

01
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-06-27WimbledonQ3grassLukas Lacko6-2 6-7(9) 6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Kamke T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.9
6.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
14
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
86
Break points won·Clear edge
22
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
17
33
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
7
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
21°CMainly clear
Wind 12 km/hHumidity 62%
Q1
Otte O.
Nanda G.
7-646-1
Menezes J.
Horansky F.
4-66-16-2
Napolitano S.
Riffice S.
6-26-4
Mahut N.
Cressy M.
3-67-56-1
Kuhn N.
Stakhovsky S.
6-46-4
Lorenzi P.[15]
Lopez Perez E.
7-56-2
Giraldo S.
Marcora R.
6-46-3
Couacaud E.
Vatutin A.
7-626-3
Krueger M.
Clarke J.
6-726-46-4
Polansky P.
Dutra Silva R.
6-33-66-4
Ivashka I.[30]
Moraing M.
6-36-0
Watanuki Y.
Gulbis E.[18]
6-26-1
Kwon S.[3]
Aragone J.
6-41-66-4
Santillan A.
Krstin P.
6-16-4
Jung J.[23]
Young D.
6-36-747-5
Benchetrit E.
Travaglia S.[1]
2-67-636-2
Menendez Maceiras A.
Halys Q.
6-26-2
Zhang Z.
Gaio F.
7-636-3
Coppejans K.[31]
Korda S.
5-76-36-1
Baldi F.
Ramanathan R.
7-57-69
Lestienne C.
Bachinger M.[12]
7-623-67-5
Chung H.[29]
Ofner S.
6-36-3
Milojevic N.
Purcell M.
6-36-736-3
Trungelliti M.
Duckworth J.[25]
6-35-76-3
Kolar Z.
Mmoh M.
2-66-17-61
Koepfer D.[11]
Harrison R.
6-16-1
Nagal S.
Ito T.[26]
7-666-2
Rubin N.
Mager G.
6-26-3
Bagnis F.
Rybakov A.
4-66-16-2
Ilkel C.
Quiroz R.
6-16-4
Diez S.
Sela D.
4-66-46-2
Giannessi A.
Wolf J.
2-67-56-2
Gombos N.[13]
Janvier M.
6-36-2
Kavcic B.
Cachin P.
6-14-66-1
Brooksby J.
Uchida K.
6-36-2
Donskoy E.[19]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-26-3
Bemelmans R.
Moriya H.
6-17-65
Zverev M.
Istomin D.[32]
7-647-68
Torpegaard M.
Molleker R.
6-27-5
Domingues J.
Nedovyesov A.
6-26-2
Majchrzak K.[4]
Berlocq C.
6-33-66-3
Galovic V.
Smith J.
7-656-4
Barrere G.[8]
Harris A.
6-757-627-63
Griekspoor T.
Ymer E.[16]
7-56-2
Uchiyama Y.
Davidovich Fokina A.[20]
7-656-3
Ward J.
Li Z.
7-656-3
Vesely J.
Sousa P.
6-47-5
Lacko L.
Maden Y.[17]
6-46-3
Garcia Lopez G.
Giustino L.[21]
3-67-56-2
Sugita Y.[27]
Polmans M.
6-36-4
Caruso S.[6]
Chung Y.
6-06-2
Ymer M.[9]
Kwiatkowski T.
5-76-37-62
Kamke T.
Andreozzi G.[7]
4-67-656-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Daniel T.[14]
7-656-766-4
Galan D.
Bolt A.[28]
6-36-3
Robredo T.
Soeda G.
6-46-4
Sinner J.[24]
Viola M.
6-16-0
Basic M.
Gojowczyk P.[2]
6-43-66-3
King D.
Jaziri M.[5]
6-26-4
Gomez E.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4
Rosol L.
Rola B.
7-53-66-1
Paul T.[10]
Hanfmann Y.
4-66-47-63
Martinez P.
Coria F.
4-66-36-2
Gerasimov E.[22]
Kozlov S.
6-46-4