Nicolas Jarry vs Lukas Klein — Luedenscheid CH Round of 32

Luedenscheid CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 August 2021
clay
Lukas Klein
SVK
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1624Clay ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
Jarry N.
1-6 7-6 7-6
Klein L.
Jarry N.
177782
Klein L.
665661

Nicolas Jarry defeated Lukas Klein 1-6 7-6 7-6 in the Luedenscheid CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Nicolas Jarry came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Nicolas Jarry extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-30WimbledonQ3grassNicolas Jarry6-4 6-2 6-4
2024-09-18ChengduR16hardNicolas Jarry7-6(2) 3-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Jarry N.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Klein L.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jarry N.Klein L.
1st serve in·Even
65%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
68%
65%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.9
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jarry N.Klein L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
48
39
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
92
Break points won·Even
4
1
Deciding sets·Slight edge
57
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jarry N.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Klein L.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+18 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Clay Elo 1624
5.6Overall Elo 1648
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1601
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
5.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[4]
Jarry N.
7-614-66-3
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[4]
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-27-64
Jarry N.
Lenz J.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo J.[6]
Ugo Carabelli C.
3-66-36-2
Altmaier D.[4]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-757-5
Jarry N.
Ajdukovic D.
6-47-65
Lenz J.
Basic M.
7-57-5
R16
Barranco Cosano J.
Haase R.[8]
W/O
Ugo Carabelli C.
Martineau M.
6-47-65
Cerundolo J.[6]
Jianu F.
6-26-2
Altmaier D.[4]
Cagnina J.
7-616-3
Ajdukovic D.
Lestienne C.[9]
6-26-4
Lenz J.
Safiullin R.[7]
5-76-46-2
Basic M.
Lamasine T.
7-626-2
Jarry N.
Carballes Baena R.[3]
5-1
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.
Martinez P.[2]
6-24-67-65
Martineau M.
Moeller M.
6-06-2
Jianu F.
Molleker R.
7-53-66-3
Cerundolo J.[6]
Vrbensky M.
6-46-2
Altmaier D.[4]
Olivieri G.
6-26-2
Cagnina J.
Zverev M.
6-36-1
Barranco Cosano J.
Mena F.
6-36-4
Lestienne C.[9]
Sels J.
6-37-5
Ajdukovic D.
Furness E.
6-37-5
Jarry N.
Klein L.
1-67-657-66
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Kicker N.
6-47-63
Safiullin R.[7]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-706-4
Lenz J.
Mochizuki S.
5-77-56-2
Lamasine T.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-3
Basic M.
Andujar P.[1]
5-77-56-0
Haase R.[8]
Cid R.
6-36-1