Casper Ruud vs Marin Cilic — Canada Masters Round of 32

Canada Masters · ATP · Round of 32
Casper Ruud
NOR6
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 August 2021
hard
Marin Cilic
CRO
Marin Cilic
#88ATP
1800ELO
1762Hard ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
Ruud C.
6-3 3-6 6-3
Cilic M.
Ruud C.
6362
Cilic M.
3631

Casper Ruud defeated Marin Cilic 6-3 3-6 6-3 in the Canada Masters round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13, leading the head-to-head 4–0. Casper Ruud extended the head-to-head to 5–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Casper Ruud closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

4–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-19Australian OpenR32hardCasper Ruud6-4 6-4 3-6 7-5
2025-10-13StockholmR16hardCasper Ruud7-6(2) 6-4
2022-05-23Roland GarrosSFclayCasper Ruud3-6 6-4 6-2 6-2
2020-09-14Rome MastersR16clayCasper Ruud6-2 7-6(6)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Cilic M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruud C.Cilic M.
59
Serve
57
31
Return
10

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Cilic M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
10.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Cilic M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
91
76
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Dominant
75
41
Deciding sets·Slight edge
99
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
97
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruud C.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Cilic M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+127 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Hard Elo 1762
6.5Overall Elo 1983
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1800
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
5.9
10.012-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Cilic M.
Freshness·Even
98
98

Ruud C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Cilic M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
29°CMainly clear
Wind 15 km/hHumidity 67%
Final
Medvedev D.[1]
Opelka R.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Opelka R.
Tsitsipas S.[3]
6-727-646-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Isner J.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Opelka R.
Bautista Agut R.[10]
6-37-61
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Ruud C.[6]
6-16-4
Isner J.
Monfils G.[11]
7-656-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Hurkacz H.[7]
2-67-667-65
R16
Opelka R.
Harris L.
4-67-667-64
Bautista Agut R.[10]
Schwartzman D.[8]
6-33-67-5
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Khachanov K.
6-36-2
Ruud C.[6]
Lajovic D.
6-46-3
Monfils G.[11]
Tiafoe F.
6-17-62
Isner J.
Rublev A.[4]
7-57-65
Hurkacz H.[7]
Basilashvili N.
6-776-46-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Duckworth J.
6-26-4
R32
Hurkacz H.[7]
Nishikori K.
W/O
Harris L.
Lopez F.
6-26-3
Opelka R.
Dimitrov G.[14]
6-36-4
Bautista Agut R.[10]
Paul T.
6-36-4
Schwartzman D.[8]
Paire B.
7-56-1
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Humbert U.
6-36-7136-1
Khachanov K.
Karatsev A.[15]
7-676-4
Lajovic D.
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
7-56-4
Ruud C.[6]
Cilic M.
6-33-66-3
Tiafoe F.
Shapovalov D.[5]
6-16-4
Monfils G.[11]
Millman J.
3-66-36-4
Isner J.
Garin C.[13]
4-66-36-4
Rublev A.[4]
Fognini F.
7-646-3
Basilashvili N.
De Minaur A.[12]
6-16-1
Duckworth J.
Sinner J.[16]
6-36-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Bublik A.
4-66-36-4
R64
Harris L.
Schnur B.
6-36-2
Opelka R.
Kyrgios N.
4-67-646-4
Paul T.
Pospisil V.
6-756-26-3
Paire B.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-4
Humbert U.
Sonego L.
6-36-4
Khachanov K.
Norrie C.
6-45-76-4
Lajovic D.
Ruusuvuori E.
3-66-36-3
Cilic M.
Ramos A.
6-24-66-3
Tiafoe F.
Nishioka Y.
6-46-3
Isner J.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-46-1
Fognini F.
Struff J.
6-726-26-4
Nishikori K.
Kecmanovic M.
6-46-756-2
Basilashvili N.
Brooksby J.
2-66-06-4
Duckworth J.
Fritz T.
7-626-3
Bublik A.
Evans D.
6-46-4
Millman J.
Berankis R.
6-37-64