Alexander Bublik vs Daniel Evans — Canada Masters Round of 64

Canada Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Alexander Bublik
KAZ
Alexander Bublik
#11ATP
1889ELO
1837Hard ELO
$1.2MYTD
$12MCAREER
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 August 2021
hard
Daniel Evans
GBR
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1562Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
Bublik A.
6-4 6-4
Evans D.
Bublik A.
662
Evans D.
440

Alexander Bublik defeated Daniel Evans 6-4 6-4 in the Canada Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Alexander Bublik came in ranked #11, leading the head-to-head 4–1. Alexander Bublik extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Alexander Bublik edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

4–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-01-08AdelaideR16hardAlexander Bublik4-6 6-2 6-1
2021-11-01Paris MastersR64hardAlexander Bublik2-6 7-5 7-5
2020-01-13AdelaideR16hardDaniel Evans7-5 6-2
2019-11-21Davis Cup Finals RR: GBR vs KAZRRhardAlexander Bublik5-7 6-4 6-1
2019-03-18Miami MastersQ2hardAlexander Bublik6-4 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Bublik A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Evans D.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Bublik A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bublik A.Evans D.
65
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bublik A.Evans D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
4.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bublik A.Evans D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
88
73
Break points saved·Even
99
97
Break points won·Slight edge
67
61
Deciding sets·Clear edge
99
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bublik A.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Evans D.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.5+275 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Hard Elo 1562
8.9Overall Elo 1889
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1588
6.1
H2H
3.9
4.5
Surface form
3.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
9.1
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bublik A.Evans D.
Freshness·Dominant
74
100

Bublik A.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d) · Evans D.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
29°CMainly clear
Wind 15 km/hHumidity 67%
Final
Medvedev D.[1]
Opelka R.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Opelka R.
Tsitsipas S.[3]
6-727-646-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Isner J.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Opelka R.
Bautista Agut R.[10]
6-37-61
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Ruud C.[6]
6-16-4
Isner J.
Monfils G.[11]
7-656-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Hurkacz H.[7]
2-67-667-65
R16
Opelka R.
Harris L.
4-67-667-64
Bautista Agut R.[10]
Schwartzman D.[8]
6-33-67-5
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Khachanov K.
6-36-2
Ruud C.[6]
Lajovic D.
6-46-3
Monfils G.[11]
Tiafoe F.
6-17-62
Isner J.
Rublev A.[4]
7-57-65
Hurkacz H.[7]
Basilashvili N.
6-776-46-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Duckworth J.
6-26-4
R32
Hurkacz H.[7]
Nishikori K.
W/O
Harris L.
Lopez F.
6-26-3
Opelka R.
Dimitrov G.[14]
6-36-4
Bautista Agut R.[10]
Paul T.
6-36-4
Schwartzman D.[8]
Paire B.
7-56-1
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Humbert U.
6-36-7136-1
Khachanov K.
Karatsev A.[15]
7-676-4
Lajovic D.
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
7-56-4
Ruud C.[6]
Cilic M.
6-33-66-3
Tiafoe F.
Shapovalov D.[5]
6-16-4
Monfils G.[11]
Millman J.
3-66-36-4
Isner J.
Garin C.[13]
4-66-36-4
Rublev A.[4]
Fognini F.
7-646-3
Basilashvili N.
De Minaur A.[12]
6-16-1
Duckworth J.
Sinner J.[16]
6-36-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Bublik A.
4-66-36-4
R64
Harris L.
Schnur B.
6-36-2
Opelka R.
Kyrgios N.
4-67-646-4
Paul T.
Pospisil V.
6-756-26-3
Paire B.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-4
Humbert U.
Sonego L.
6-36-4
Khachanov K.
Norrie C.
6-45-76-4
Lajovic D.
Ruusuvuori E.
3-66-36-3
Cilic M.
Ramos A.
6-24-66-3
Tiafoe F.
Nishioka Y.
6-46-3
Isner J.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-46-1
Fognini F.
Struff J.
6-726-26-4
Nishikori K.
Kecmanovic M.
6-46-756-2
Basilashvili N.
Brooksby J.
2-66-06-4
Duckworth J.
Fritz T.
7-626-3
Bublik A.
Evans D.
6-46-4
Millman J.
Berankis R.
6-37-64