John Isner vs Jack Sock — Atlanta Round of 16

Atlanta · ATP · Round of 16
USA6
John Isner
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
hard
USA
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Isner J.
7-6 6-4
Sock J.
Isner J.
7862
Sock J.
6640

John Isner defeated Jack Sock 7-6 6-4 in the Atlanta round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — John Isner came in leading the head-to-head 5–3. John Isner extended the head-to-head to 6–3.

Key context

Head to head

5–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-10-31Paris MastersQFhardJohn Isner7-6(6) 4-6 6-4
2016-04-04HoustonSFclayJack Sock7-6(4) 6-3
2015-10-26BaselR16hardJack Sock7-6(5) 6-3
2014-07-21AtlantaSFhardJohn Isner7-5 6-4
2014-07-07NewportQFgrassJack Sock6-4 7-6(4)
2014-05-18NiceR16clayJohn Isner6-4 6-3
2013-04-08HoustonR16clayJohn Isner7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(3)
2012-07-16AtlantaQFhardJohn Isner7-6(7) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Isner J.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Sock J.serving96% hold

wins 76% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Isner J.Sock J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
28%
36%
Break points saved·Even
67%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
21.1
6.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (98 vs 98). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Isner J.Sock J.
Clutch Rating·Even
64
67
Break points saved·Even
99
96
Break points won·Dominant
0
28
Deciding sets·Slight edge
91
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
98
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Isner J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sock J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
7.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
4.6
7.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Isner J.[6]
Nakashima B.
7-687-5
Semi-finals
Isner J.[6]
Fritz T.[5]
7-645-76-3
Nakashima B.
Ruusuvuori E.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.[5]
Opelka R.[4]
7-656-737-64
Isner J.[6]
Oconnell C.
7-656-736-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Norrie C.[3]
7-616-3
Nakashima B.
Thompson J.
7-657-5
R16
Nakashima B.
Raonic M.[1]
5-76-37-64
Ruusuvuori E.
Paire B.[7]
4-66-43-0
Opelka R.[4]
Fratangelo B.
7-637-64
Oconnell C.
Sinner J.[2]
7-676-4
Norrie C.[3]
Kyrgios N.
6-16-4
Thompson J.
Gojowczyk P.
7-666-4
Isner J.[6]
Sock J.
7-666-4
Fritz T.[5]
Johnson S.
6-756-46-1
R32
Fratangelo B.
Seppi A.
7-57-65
Oconnell C.
Kudla D.
4-66-36-3
Sock J.
Berankis R.
6-746-47-5
Isner J.[6]
Wolf J.
6-46-736-4
Johnson S.
Popyrin A.
7-646-3
Fritz T.[5]
Donskoy E.
6-36-4
Paire B.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-726-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Mcdonald M.
7-637-5
Kyrgios N.
Anderson K.
7-646-3
Gojowczyk P.
Querrey S.
4-67-637-65
Nakashima B.
Bryde T.
6-16-756-4
Thompson J.
Harris L.[8]
7-621-66-2