John Isner vs Jack Sock — Atlanta Semi-final

Atlanta · ATP · Semi-final
USA1
John Isner
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 July 2014
hard
USA
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Isner J.
7-5 6-4
Sock J.
Isner J.
762
Sock J.
540

John Isner defeated Jack Sock 7-5 6-4 in the Atlanta semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — John Isner came in leading the head-to-head 5–3, defending the title. John Isner extended the head-to-head to 6–3.

Key context

Head to head

5–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-07-26AtlantaR16hardJohn Isner7-6(6) 6-4
2016-10-31Paris MastersQFhardJohn Isner7-6(6) 4-6 6-4
2016-04-04HoustonSFclayJack Sock7-6(4) 6-3
2015-10-26BaselR16hardJack Sock7-6(5) 6-3
2014-07-07NewportQFgrassJack Sock6-4 7-6(4)
2014-05-18NiceR16clayJohn Isner6-4 6-3
2013-04-08HoustonR16clayJohn Isner7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(3)
2012-07-16AtlantaQFhardJohn Isner7-6(7) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Isner J.serving96% hold

wins 77% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Sock J.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Isner J.Sock J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
80%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
56%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
29%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
70%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
21.7
6.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Isner J.Sock J.
Clutch Rating·Even
64
67
Break points saved·Even
99
96
Break points won·Dominant
0
28
Deciding sets·Slight edge
91
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
98
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Isner J.[1]
Sela D.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Isner J.[1]
Sock J.
7-56-4
Sela D.
Becker B.
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Sock J.
Lacko L.
7-666-2
Becker B.
De Bakker T.
6-46-2
Isner J.[1]
Matosevic M.[8]
7-686-4
Sela D.
Pospisil V.[4]
7-51-66-2
R16
Isner J.[1]
Ginepri R.
4-67-657-5
Matosevic M.[8]
Smyczek T.
6-47-5
Sock J.
Venus M.
6-46-2
Sela D.
Querrey S.[9]
6-26-4
Becker B.
Lu Y.[7]
6-46-3
De Bakker T.
Anderson K.[2]
6-47-5
Lacko L.
Istomin D.[6]
5-76-16-4
Pospisil V.[4]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
R32
Matosevic M.[8]
Estrella V.
6-06-2
Ginepri R.
Stakhovsky S.
7-633-66-0
Smyczek T.
Harrison R.
6-06-2
Sock J.
Gonzalez A.
6-26-4
Lacko L.
Pasha N.
6-27-5
Querrey S.[9]
Johnson S.
7-637-5
Sela D.
Young D.
6-36-0
Lu Y.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-4
De Bakker T.
Diez S.
6-16-2
Marchenko I.
Smith J.
6-46-4
Becker B.
Ebden M.
6-46-2
Istomin D.[6]
Ram R.
6-16-4